Started By
Message
re: wildrebletime is back as AmosBallentine
Posted on 6/17/09 at 7:17 pm to woopiginaustin
Posted on 6/17/09 at 7:17 pm to woopiginaustin
If you look at the statistics and budget of recruiting base, what I am saying is true.
I never figured Purdue had more potential than Arkansas. But I have done alot of research and it appears they do. At least within the last 4 to 6 years they have put more guys in the pros.
that's why the big10 and SEc don't play much.
I never figured Purdue had more potential than Arkansas. But I have done alot of research and it appears they do. At least within the last 4 to 6 years they have put more guys in the pros.
that's why the big10 and SEc don't play much.
This post was edited on 6/17/09 at 7:23 pm
1
Posted on 6/17/09 at 7:44 pm to AmosBallentine
As usual you don't base it off of anything consistent, but rather base your argument off the NFL production wrt, which isn't terribly relevant to college if the team doesn't gel or if that player doesn't develop until after he leaves.
Based on your findings I suppose you assume that Purdue would fare better in the SEC than Arkansas?
Based on your findings I suppose you assume that Purdue would fare better in the SEC than Arkansas?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News