Started By
Message
re: SEC vs. PAC (Wack) 10
Posted on 4/24/09 at 6:01 pm to True Bengal
Posted on 4/24/09 at 6:01 pm to True Bengal
Wouldn't a conference head-to-head be according to team rankings within their conference? If so, it would/could look something like...
USC - UF
Ore - Ala
OSU - UGA
Cal - Miss
Ari - Van
ASU - SCar
Sta - LSU
UCL - Ten
WSU - Ken
Was - Aub
(Ark, MSU)
*Ken, Aub, Ark are all tied within the conference. Didn't apply any tiebreaker research.
USC - UF
Ore - Ala
OSU - UGA
Cal - Miss
Ari - Van
ASU - SCar
Sta - LSU
UCL - Ten
WSU - Ken
Was - Aub
(Ark, MSU)
*Ken, Aub, Ark are all tied within the conference. Didn't apply any tiebreaker research.
Posted on 4/25/09 at 9:23 am to True Bengal
quote:
Wouldn't a conference head-to-head be according to team rankings within their conference? If so, it would/could look something like...
USC - UF
Ore - Ala
OSU - UGA
Cal - Miss
Ari - Van
ASU - SCar
Sta - LSU
UCL - Ten
WSU - Ken
Was - Aub
(Ark, MSU)
*Ken, Aub, Ark are all tied within the conference. Didn't apply any tiebreaker research.
I don't think conference strength should be influenced by the number of teams a conference has. So because the SEC has 12 and the Pac-10 has 10, it would not be fair to leave the 2 worst SEC teams out of this sort of match-up. I think you should leave out the SEC 6 and 7 placed teams, or 1 and 12 placed teams. Something like that.
Then you'd have:
USC-Florida
Oregon-Alabama
Oregon State-Georgia
Cal-Ole Miss
Arizona-Vanderbilt
Stanford-Tennessee
Arizona State-Kentucky
UCLA-Arkansas
Washington State-Auburn
Washington-Mississippi State
or
USC-Alabama
Oregon-Georgia
Oregon State-Ole Miss
Cal-Vanderbilt
Arizona-South Carolina
Stanford-LSU
Arizona State-Tennessee
UCLA-Kentucky
Washington State-Arkansas
Washington-Auburn
This post was edited on 4/25/09 at 9:25 am
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/SR_Icon.jpg)