- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: It’s interference. With visual evidence and the rule
Posted on 5/11/24 at 1:23 pm to lsupride87
Posted on 5/11/24 at 1:23 pm to lsupride87
quote:
If they are outside of the line after 45 feet while interfering it’s an out
Can we find a point to agree upon here? So, you will admit that, by the rule, at the very least the runners path could have been ruled interference?
The hanging point seems to be how we define “interfered” with the throw? As in did it interfere with his ABILITY to throw or did it interfere with the ACTUAL throw?
Posted on 5/11/24 at 1:27 pm to hall59tiger
I am truly wondering how a runner left of the line, with the position player being well left of that, would interfere with the play. I am more confused why you think that would chase the player to throw it further right
Look here, why in gods earth would the purple dot think, “I NEED TO THROW THIS FURTHER RIGHT!!!”
Look at the straight line. It’s wide open. The further right you go the more you bring the runner into play. He just choked the throw
Look here, why in gods earth would the purple dot think, “I NEED TO THROW THIS FURTHER RIGHT!!!”
Look at the straight line. It’s wide open. The further right you go the more you bring the runner into play. He just choked the throw
This post was edited on 5/11/24 at 1:31 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News