Started By
Message

re: It’s interference. With visual evidence and the rule

Posted on 5/11/24 at 1:23 pm to
Posted by hall59tiger
Member since Oct 2013
2489 posts
Posted on 5/11/24 at 1:23 pm to
quote:

If they are outside of the line after 45 feet while interfering it’s an out


Can we find a point to agree upon here? So, you will admit that, by the rule, at the very least the runners path could have been ruled interference?

The hanging point seems to be how we define “interfered” with the throw? As in did it interfere with his ABILITY to throw or did it interfere with the ACTUAL throw?
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
96005 posts
Posted on 5/11/24 at 1:27 pm to
I am truly wondering how a runner left of the line, with the position player being well left of that, would interfere with the play. I am more confused why you think that would chase the player to throw it further right

Look here, why in gods earth would the purple dot think, “I NEED TO THROW THIS FURTHER RIGHT!!!”



Look at the straight line. It’s wide open. The further right you go the more you bring the runner into play. He just choked the throw

This post was edited on 5/11/24 at 1:31 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram