Started By
Message

re: It’s interference. With visual evidence and the rule

Posted on 5/11/24 at 12:38 pm to
Posted by hall59tiger
Member since Oct 2013
2497 posts
Posted on 5/11/24 at 12:38 pm to
quote:

no interference with the throw or catch has occurred up to this point in time


This is proves it was interference and where your argument crumbles to pieces. The runner was well inside the baseline at the time of the throw, clearly interfering. That’s exactly what happened lol
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
96197 posts
Posted on 5/11/24 at 12:39 pm to
quote:

This is proves it was interference and where your argument crumbles to pieces. The runner was well inside the baseline at the time of the throw, clearly interfering. That’s exactly what happened lol
He was no where near interfering with the throw through

The throw went right of the damn bag and the runner was nowhere near it

Purple dot is Milazzo, red dot is gump. Please tell me there was interference to the throw. He has a wide arse open throwing lane

This post was edited on 5/11/24 at 12:48 pm
Posted by GetmorewithLes
UK Basketball Fan
Member since Jan 2011
19140 posts
Posted on 5/11/24 at 1:28 pm to
quote:

This is proves it was interference and where your argument crumbles to pieces. The runner was well inside the baseline at the time of the throw, clearly interfering. That’s exactly what happened lol


If you go back and slide the action back and forth on the replay you will see that the runner actually has a foot on the infield grass as the ball is releasing from Milazzo's hand. So while the play was being executed/fielded the runner was well out of the running lane...
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram