Started By
Message

re: Someone explain to me how that is not interference

Posted on 5/11/24 at 12:46 pm to
Posted by hall59tiger
Member since Oct 2013
2489 posts
Posted on 5/11/24 at 12:46 pm to
quote:

lot of people still think it should not have been called


This is misleading. At the time of this play, all of the announcers were saying they should change the rule, not that by the book it wasn’t interference. Nuanced point but important.




This pic shows the ball clearly leaving Millazo’s hand while the bama player is even further inside the baseline compared to the Florida player. The bama call was way way way more egregious. By the rules, it was interference. You can say it’s a stupid rule for sure, I may even agree with you, but you can’t say it doesn’t meet the current criteria for interference.
Posted by cajunjoey2010
Member since May 2021
191 posts
Posted on 5/11/24 at 1:13 pm to
Even if the runner is running in the running lane, Milazzo still throws it behind. Him. By rule it is interference, but where he was running did not effect the play. Milazzo made a horrible throw and should not be rewarded with the interference call and be bailed out. Make the simple play. You are supposed to be the leader of the catchers group for a SEC team. Play like one
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram