Started By
Message

Who will pay for revenue sharing

Posted on 5/1/24 at 9:55 pm
Posted by bamaoldtimer
Member since Dec 2009
998 posts
Posted on 5/1/24 at 9:55 pm
Heard about this today and found it interesting but not surprising. Seems a lawsuit against the ncaa begins this January from former players wanting compensation from years past. Correct me if I got the essence of the lawsuit incorrect. Seems the powers to be want to make things right before then in hopes of suit going away.

Heard somewhere around 8% of revenue shared with players. Assume that’s gross. So, take $200 million total athletic department revenue and thats $16 million. Quite a hit. Where will the school get that money?

Here’s where the real separation amongst schools begins. Side deals with the networks per school.

Alabama 7.12M (11 games)
Ohio State 6.05M (11)
Colorado 6M (9)
Georgia 5.9M (11)
Michigan 5.61M (12)
Tennessee 4.57M (7)
Oregon 4.43M (10)
Texas 4.26M (12)
Florida State 4.16M (12)
Notre Dame 4.15M (10)

Alabama was most watched team last year. Roughly 77,000,000 eyeballs. Alabama tells Sankey they want $.25 cents per viewer in addition to whatever overall deal the SEC has negotiated. Alabama’s leverage is leaving the conference. Or getting rid of Sankey.

That’s $19,250,000 million.

Sorry for long winded post but this is a big deal that going to change the sport we all love.

RTR
Posted by Gman84
Member since Aug 2021
684 posts
Posted on 5/1/24 at 10:00 pm to
Who will pay? Maybe the same dumb fricks that pay coaches $27M - $85M not to coach.

CFB lost the argument on paying players with idiotic buyouts for coaches nobody wants.
Posted by footswitch
New Market
Member since Apr 2015
3957 posts
Posted on 5/1/24 at 10:21 pm to
The future of college football does not include me.
Posted by PerrillouxToTexas
Member since Sep 2022
5371 posts
Posted on 5/1/24 at 10:22 pm to
quote:

Alabama’s leverage is leaving the conference.

Sankey's mission is to make that happen anyway. The schools you list plus a 10 or so more will form a league where every game is plus-ratings. That's the only way the networks will pay for all this shite.
Posted by SG_Geaux
Beautiful St George
Member since Aug 2004
78060 posts
Posted on 5/1/24 at 10:25 pm to
quote:

Who will pay for revenue sharing


The fans
Posted by Clark14
L.A.Hog
Member since Dec 2014
19746 posts
Posted on 5/1/24 at 10:28 pm to
I’m tired of this shite……well unless I can figure out a way to get a cut of it..
Posted by bamaoldtimer
Member since Dec 2009
998 posts
Posted on 5/2/24 at 7:40 am to
quote:


quote:
Who will pay for revenue sharing


The fans


My crystal ball shows this leading to formation of Super SEC with 32 teams taken from Big 12, ACC, Big 10, and a few G5 with massive potential.

I don’t think the SEC would be well served getting in bed with the Big 10. Take away OSU and Penn St, Michigan their brand of ball is boring.

I see two conferences evolving like old AFC and NFC. 32 teams each.

Super Bowl for college. Other teams go their own way.

Players become employees. Collective bargaining. Contracts. Draft like NFL. No recruiting. Players must stay 4 years minimum and graduate for full compensation.

Structured exactly like NFL.

Yes, we fans will pay. Me, I’m watching on big screen. But, I do see streaming coming and having to pay for top games. I expect in next round eventually Amazon, Apple, Netflix etc will buy certain games. Can you imagine LSU/ Bama with 12 million eyeballs paying $4.99 to watch on Amazon. I’ll pay.
Posted by dstone12
Texan
Member since Jan 2007
30459 posts
Posted on 5/2/24 at 7:44 am to
I had no clue about this and it appears to be something that the aggy fans will traumatically remember about their big12 days.

Larger portions of the pie via side deals.




But it will instantly make you wonder if Alabama/UGA should get the same amounts-or-portion as Vanderbilt/Missouri
This post was edited on 5/2/24 at 8:00 am
Posted by MU91
Minnesota
Member since Oct 2013
107 posts
Posted on 5/2/24 at 9:02 am to
I think you meant to say Ole Miss,, MS State, USC
Posted by bigDgator
Dallas, TX
Member since Oct 2008
41622 posts
Posted on 5/2/24 at 9:07 am to
The top .01% of college coaches make that kind of money and it is after being in the business for 30 fricking years. How in the frick are you going to compare 100 teenagers to that? It is asinine to pay these kids what they are paying them and it is just going to frick most of them up because they aren't learning the skills they need to learn before they make crazy amounts of money so they can have the discipline to deal with it properly.

The fans are paying for it. The fans pay for everything.

This post was edited on 5/2/24 at 9:08 am
Posted by Oxford Ways
Member since Jun 2015
4347 posts
Posted on 5/2/24 at 9:19 am to
quote:

Colorado 6M (9)


A great example on how marketing without a quality product can do wonders....
Posted by gamecockman12
Columbia, SC
Member since Aug 2012
5994 posts
Posted on 5/2/24 at 9:22 am to
quote:

The future of college football does not include me


Posted by dstone12
Texan
Member since Jan 2007
30459 posts
Posted on 5/2/24 at 9:29 am to
quote:

I think you meant to say Ole Miss,, MS State, USC


Nope. I meant you.
Posted by BigTx
Member since Aug 2021
520 posts
Posted on 5/2/24 at 9:57 am to
quote:

Players become employees. Collective bargaining. Contracts. Draft like NFL. No recruiting. Players must stay 4 years minimum and graduate for full compensation.


Sounds boring. Might as well watch the pros.
Posted by BevoBucks
H-town
Member since Dec 2022
4009 posts
Posted on 5/2/24 at 9:57 am to
quote:

The future of college football does not include me.
As long as your ESPN autopay stays on. The whole goal of this sport, from admin on down to players, is to leverage nostalgia into $$$.
Posted by IamNotaRobot
OKC
Member since Nov 2021
236 posts
Posted on 5/2/24 at 10:59 am to
Nobody is gonna pay extra to watch college football. It worked for Peacock but it had the NFLs brand and Talir Swift.
Posted by bamaoldtimer
Member since Dec 2009
998 posts
Posted on 5/2/24 at 1:32 pm to
quote:

Nobody is gonna pay extra to watch college football. It worked for Peacock but it had the NFLs brand and Talir Swift.


I respectfully disagree. I’d venture it probably will be for individual games along with free games. SEC will need to raise more revenue things will get greedy. For us rabid college fans, we’ll pay to watch Texas / OU, Bama/ LSU, Texas / A&M etc. The free games will be like Missouri/ Vandy. Etc . I don’t like it but the asshats that run the sport already don’t give a F—. About us. So why should they hesitate to bleed as much as they can from us?

Texas was a little ahead of its time with the LHN but had the right idea.

Posted by Mizzouligan
St. Louis, MO
Member since Aug 2014
393 posts
Posted on 5/2/24 at 1:45 pm to
quote:
I think you meant to say Ole Miss,, MS State, USC


Nope. I meant you.


Serious question: which Mizzou player banger your mom and gave her herpes?
This post was edited on 5/2/24 at 1:47 pm
Posted by djsdawg
Member since Apr 2015
33056 posts
Posted on 5/2/24 at 1:51 pm to
Hopefully the tv deals will pay it.
Posted by Farmer1906
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Apr 2009
50701 posts
Posted on 5/2/24 at 2:01 pm to
That's not happening.
Page 1 2
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter