Started By
Message
re: NAIA says 'No' to man parts in women's sports
Posted on 4/9/24 at 8:26 am to Pastor Mike
Posted on 4/9/24 at 8:26 am to Pastor Mike
I actually think this decision is less reactionary than people will make it out to be:
Everyone is welcome to compete in men's competition; women's competition is only for biological females.
It even lets biological females to compete against men if they think they're up to it. Basically, "men's sports" is really the open competition track.
Everyone is welcome to compete in men's competition; women's competition is only for biological females.
It even lets biological females to compete against men if they think they're up to it. Basically, "men's sports" is really the open competition track.
3
Posted on 4/9/24 at 8:54 am to Diego Ricardo
Yep. Why else would a biological male want to compete against women. Could be because they can dominate and feel good about themselves, which obviously is a problem to begin with
Posted on 4/9/24 at 8:57 am to Diego Ricardo
They didn't want Vandy to be without a FG kicker 
Posted on 4/9/24 at 12:45 pm to Diego Ricardo
quote:
I actually think this decision is less reactionary than people will make it out to be: Everyone is welcome to compete in men's competition; women's competition is only for biological females. It even lets biological females to compete against men if they think they're up to it. Basically, "men's sports" is really the open competition track.
Exactly. They should just stop calling it men’s sports and women’s sports. They should call it “Open sports” - anyone can try and compete, and “Born with vagina sports” - only those born with vagina can try and compete. .
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News