Started By
Message
re: Would you take Musselman or Calipari?
Posted on 4/8/24 at 10:45 pm to dchog
Posted on 4/8/24 at 10:45 pm to dchog
quote:
I would imagine Frank Broyles and many in the administration didn't like the idea that football was taking a backseat to basketball.
It was Broyles who invested in basketball and the other sports to make them the best. Why wouldn’t he like the basketball program doing well?
But football was what paid for the other sports so there was a priority put on it. If Richardson didn’t like it he should have gone elsewhere and see if he could get paid more. I doubt it.
1
Posted on 4/8/24 at 11:53 pm to Clark14
Because Broyles and Richardson didn't like each other. And in his own words said that Nutt was getting more support than he did with more compensation and bonuses but little achievement.
Football does pay for other sports but that shouldn't be an excuse that a 7-5 football coach should be paid more money than a national champion basketball coach. That is called not showing any appreciation and not taking care of your employee.
He said he could have left for other jobs and got paid more but turned them down.
Football does pay for other sports but that shouldn't be an excuse that a 7-5 football coach should be paid more money than a national champion basketball coach. That is called not showing any appreciation and not taking care of your employee.
He said he could have left for other jobs and got paid more but turned them down.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News