Started By
Message
Who is First To Include a Non-Compete Clause in a NIL Contract?
Posted on 2/24/24 at 7:38 pm
Posted on 2/24/24 at 7:38 pm
So the courts have ruled there are no rules on NIL. Yet non-compete clauses have been taken to court and ruled legal.
What school’s collective do you think has the balls to be the first to include a non-compete clause in a NIL contract? That would fix the transfer portal issue for that player really quickly. And will they be up front about it? Or bury it down deep in the contract?
What school’s collective do you think has the balls to be the first to include a non-compete clause in a NIL contract? That would fix the transfer portal issue for that player really quickly. And will they be up front about it? Or bury it down deep in the contract?
2
Posted on 2/24/24 at 7:40 pm to captdalton
So your plan is to make unhappy players stay? Bold strategy
Posted on 2/24/24 at 9:02 pm to captdalton
quote:
What school’s collective do you think has the balls to be the first to include a non-compete clause in a NIL contract? That would fix the transfer portal issue for that player really quickly. And will they be up front about it? Or bury it down deep in the contract?
The one that plans to not sign anyone? All that would do is be a recruiting advantage for every school recruiting against them.
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News