Started By
Message
re: Can an opposing NIL collective ink a deal with a player to just not play?
Posted on 2/24/24 at 8:02 pm to lsufball19
Posted on 2/24/24 at 8:02 pm to lsufball19
You think paying a good player to play for your team has a legal distinction from paying a good player to not play for the other one?
When does it stop being the former and start being the latter?
When does it stop being the former and start being the latter?
This post was edited on 2/24/24 at 8:03 pm
2
Posted on 2/24/24 at 8:07 pm to Hateradedrink
It’s also bribery. Here’s a federal criminal statute for you
LINK
It’s illegal bud. Move on
LINK
quote:
18 U.S. Code § 224 - Bribery in sporting contests
U.S. Code
Notes
prev | next
(a) Whoever carries into effect, attempts to carry into effect, or conspires with any other person to carry into effect any scheme in commerce to influence, in any way, by bribery any sporting contest, with knowledge that the purpose of such scheme is to influence by bribery that contest, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.
It’s illegal bud. Move on
This post was edited on 2/24/24 at 10:13 pm
Posted on 2/28/24 at 1:22 am to Hateradedrink
quote:
You think paying a good player to play for your team has a legal distinction from paying a good player to not play for the other one?
yes
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News