Started By
Message
re: Can an opposing NIL collective ink a deal with a player to just not play?
Posted on 2/24/24 at 6:52 pm to Hateradedrink
Posted on 2/24/24 at 6:52 pm to Hateradedrink
I say yes. But what is more likely is that Blue Bloods will just buy smaller schools and keep players on those rosters to call up if needed, and to your point, play keep away.
This practice will escalate greatly when they put a cap on what university can spend.
This practice will escalate greatly when they put a cap on what university can spend.
4
Posted on 2/24/24 at 7:00 pm to IvIerlot
I didn’t even think of that. Crazy. They could pay an NIL with the understand they DONT sign with a school or that they sign with a sun belt school to come up later.
Posted on 2/27/24 at 7:37 am to IvIerlot
quote:
This practice will escalate greatly when they put a cap on what university can spend.
Not sure how they could cap what a university can spend.
NIL deals are between a player and a third party company. The courts have spoken in that they don't believe the NCAA or any organization can limit these contracts. A cap by definition is a limitation and not one on the schools but rather on those 3rd party NIL deals. There's no way a cap would stand.
Posted on 2/27/24 at 10:48 am to IvIerlot
quote:
I say yes. But what is more likely is that Blue Bloods will just buy smaller schools and keep players on those rosters to call up if needed, and to your point, play keep away.
Farm teams for farm teams.
Posted on 2/27/24 at 7:24 pm to IvIerlot
This is what I thought. Similar to when schools would place players at jucos. It'll just be a feeder for a big school.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News