Started By
Message

re: Post-Injunction Situation - Where We Stand Now

Posted on 2/24/24 at 9:48 am to
Posted by ouflak
Manchester, England
Member since Jul 2021
353 posts
Posted on 2/24/24 at 9:48 am to
quote:

Of course there is. If it's the only game in town, it's the only game in town. Before a few years ago, they had no choice but to play for tuition.

If they don't enroll and play for a team, there is no NIL money.


What you're suggesting has already been illegal for about a century. You cannot force a public employee to join a union. Period. If someone wants to attend a public institution, they cannot be forced to join a union in order to participate in any activity on that the school sponsors. On top of that, those student-athletes/employees can't even be forced to pay dues or honor a union contract if they are not members. That's a recent Supreme Court ruling.

I don't know what reasoning you are applying getting around very long extant federal law and recent Supreme Court rulings. But I'm interested in hearing it.
This post was edited on 2/24/24 at 9:54 am
Posted by Smokeys Howl
Member since Oct 2022
1985 posts
Posted on 2/24/24 at 1:48 pm to
quote:

What you're suggesting has already been illegal for about a century.


What are you babbling about. Until three years ago, players could go to college and play for tuition or they could fk off and go straight to Brushy Mountain.

It was the only game in town.
This post was edited on 2/24/24 at 1:49 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter