Started By
Message

re: Tennessee AD Danny White releases statement, goes HAM on NCAA

Posted on 2/1/24 at 3:01 pm to
Posted by DawginSC
Member since Aug 2022
4384 posts
Posted on 2/1/24 at 3:01 pm to
To me, the question should be:

If the player transfers to a nearby school or quits football entirely, will they still be able to legally complete the contract and be paid.

If the answer to that is "no", the NCAA has the responsibility to punish the school for breaking the "pay to play" rule for NIL. NIL deals are required to be disclosed by the player to the school and the school is required to suspend a player who signs a NIL deal in violation of NCAA rules (and suspend them if they are found to have entered a deal they did not disclose).

If the school fails to do this, they should be punished for it.

I don't see any of this as bad. As soon as these contracts get guaranteed even if the player transfers, those contracts will stop being given to players and pay to play will go away. Contracts will only be given to guys who are on the team, not for player to join the team. They won't be multi-year either. That's where NIL needs to get to, and we should all be onboard with the NCAA moving in that direction.

Posted by Smokeys Howl
Member since Oct 2022
1985 posts
Posted on 2/1/24 at 3:04 pm to
quote:

That's where NIL needs to get to, and we should all be onboard with the NCAA moving in that direction.


Most football fans are on board with the NCAA getting TFO.
Posted by LewEvansFan
Member since Mar 2023
2563 posts
Posted on 2/1/24 at 3:05 pm to
No, why the hell would a company like Calhouns or Bank of College town use an athlete for an NIL deal if they could leave for their rival and they still have to pay them? And why punish the school for that?

The NCAA cannot regulate NIL deals.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter