Started By
Message
re: Explain the Harsin comparisons to DeBoer with logic.
Posted on 1/22/24 at 12:24 pm to 3down10
Posted on 1/22/24 at 12:24 pm to 3down10
quote:
But On3 has rankings for them now, and that is the formula everyone uses today and thinks is the best.
I haven't seen anyone use this, except you
quote:
Besides that, having them ranked 8th instead of 4th and 5th is not some big flex. That you think 3 and 4 spots makes that much of a difference only goes to highlight how weak your overall argument is. The fact remains that Notre Dame did not recruit poorly before BK, they aren't recruiting poorly after BK.
I never said they "recruit poorly."
I said they are no longer an elite program and being a blue blood doesn't matter in modern college football.
This post was edited on 1/22/24 at 12:30 pm
1
Posted on 1/22/24 at 12:30 pm to SidewalkTiger
quote:
I haven't saw anyone use this, except you
So you are claiming everyone uses rivals? I could believe you are still using 24/7, but rivals?
quote:
I never said they "recruit poorly."
I said they are no longer an elite program and being a blue blood doesn't matter in modern college football.
Here is your quote:
Being a blue blood doesn't mean shite anymore. Notre Dame isn't a top 10 team in terms of talent, recruiting, facilities, or NIL resources. They aren't as financially committed to football as the actual elite programs, it's why they haven't won a major bowl game in 30 years.
Even the lowest rankings you could find have them in the top10 before BK. You had to go back 5 years prior to BK to make an argument to find a coach who was a bad recruiter.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News