Nobody, that's the only reason people used them...back then. But On3 has rankings for them now, and that is the formula everyone uses today and thinks is the best.

Besides that, having them ranked 8th instead of 4th and 5th is not some big flex. That you think 3 and 4 spots makes that much of a difference only goes to highlight how weak your overall argument is. The fact remains that Notre Dame did not recruit poorly before BK, they aren't recruiting poorly after BK.

quote:

You have moved the goalposts all over the place.

Maybe one day, somehow, you will understand that Notre Dame isn't an elite program anymore and hasn't been for some time.

The only one moving the goal posts is you. Since I said right away they weren't elite, they were a blue blood. Learn the difference.

Before Saban, nobody was calling Alabama an elite program either, just a blue blood.

People have been making fun of Michigan for the past 20 years, they weren't an elite program, just a blue blood.

Maybe you just can't see the goal post because you have no concept of football beyond the past 10 years.

This post was edited on 1/22/24 at 12:20 pm

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by SidewalkTiger

Midwest, USA

Member since Dec 2019

53454 posts

Posted on 1/22/24 at 12:24 pm to 3down10

quote:
But On3 has rankings for them now, and that is the formula everyone uses today and thinks is the best.

I haven't seen anyone use this, except you

quote:
Besides that, having them ranked 8th instead of 4th and 5th is not some big flex. That you think 3 and 4 spots makes that much of a difference only goes to highlight how weak your overall argument is. The fact remains that Notre Dame did not recruit poorly before BK, they aren't recruiting poorly after BK.

I never said they "recruit poorly."

I said they are no longer an elite program and being a blue blood doesn't matter in modern college football.