Started By
Message
re: 3/6 Schedule Matrix + Permanents
Posted on 1/19/24 at 6:40 am to BigBinBR
Posted on 1/19/24 at 6:40 am to BigBinBR
If/When they get to 9 conference games they need to adopt the flex scheduling model of the Big Ten.
Oklahoma doesn't need 3 permanents, as an outsider S.Car doesn't appear to either.
If they're gonna stick at 8 conference games then I don't understand why pods have been eliminated- it's a much improved model from your last one and solves bulk of rivalry issues.
Oklahoma doesn't need 3 permanents, as an outsider S.Car doesn't appear to either.
If they're gonna stick at 8 conference games then I don't understand why pods have been eliminated- it's a much improved model from your last one and solves bulk of rivalry issues.
2
Posted on 1/19/24 at 6:47 am to OklahomaLurker
quote:
If/When they get to 9 conference games they need to adopt the flex scheduling model of the Big Ten. Oklahoma doesn't need 3 permanents, as an outsider S.Car doesn't appear to either.
How does the flex work? If you have less than 3, you just rotate the rest? I could see the benefit there.
quote:
If they're gonna stick at 8 conference games then I don't understand why pods have been eliminated- it's a much improved model from your last one and solves bulk of rivalry issues.
3 + 4 + 1? That would be better than 1/7, I agree.
I think they should have just kept divisions at 8 games or gone to a 2/6 or 3/5. The 3/5 actually works really good imo, but none of the 8 game models are perfect.
Posted on 1/19/24 at 10:16 am to OklahomaLurker
1 - How does the flex scheduling work? My personal wish is that ALL teams play the same # of opponents & finish the rotation at the same time.
2 - The only issues I know with pods is:
A - Their breakdown
B - Keeping ALL YEARLY rivalries between teams not in the same pod.
2 - The only issues I know with pods is:
A - Their breakdown
B - Keeping ALL YEARLY rivalries between teams not in the same pod.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News