Started By
Message
Truth is, if Lanning or Sark said yes, non-gumps would’ve been better off.
Posted on 1/13/24 at 9:11 am
Posted on 1/13/24 at 9:11 am
Bama got the best guy by default.
10
Posted on 1/13/24 at 9:11 am to TigerProphet
Huh?
Posted on 1/13/24 at 9:12 am to TigerProphet
quote:
Bama got the best guy by default.
Based on your other takes, I support this post.
Posted on 1/13/24 at 9:12 am to TigerProphet
Nobody will know until down the road.
We’ll see how the current roster and recruiting class holds together, and we’ll see how he recruits while coaching in the south for the first time.
We’ll see how the current roster and recruiting class holds together, and we’ll see how he recruits while coaching in the south for the first time.
Posted on 1/13/24 at 9:14 am to TigerProphet
What? I'm extremely happy that they didn't get Lanning, Sark, or Norvell. The DeBoer hire is a risk. Not a huge risk, but still a risk.
Posted on 1/13/24 at 9:37 am to TigerProphet
Your no prophet
Posted on 1/13/24 at 9:39 am to TigerProphet
I believe Sexton controlled the narrative,
took advantage and Bama/Byrne got the guy they wanted.
took advantage and Bama/Byrne got the guy they wanted.
Posted on 1/13/24 at 9:42 am to TigerProphet
I think that is true regarding Lanning
Posted on 1/13/24 at 10:04 am to TigerProphet
You'll know in about 3 years or so. DeBoer appears to be the best in-game coach, but mediocre or less at everything else. He's like an inverse Mario Cristobal.
Posted on 1/13/24 at 10:06 am to TigerProphet
quote:
Truth is, if Lanning or Sark said yes, non-gumps would’ve been better off.
Word is, neither were offered the job. But yes, Alabama did get the best guy.
Posted on 1/13/24 at 10:06 am to TigerProphet
Lanning and Sark are far better
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News