Started By
Message

Coal miners in North Dakota discover 7-foot mammoth tusk in incredible condition

Posted on 1/8/24 at 3:29 pm
Posted by Moon Pie
Member since Jan 2024
37 posts
Posted on 1/8/24 at 3:29 pm
Biden immediately announced coal mining in North Dakota must be stopped because mammoths are an endangered species.

All jokes aside. this is a very well preserved relic.

quote:

The ivory tusk weighs more than 50 pounds and has been buried for an estimated 10,000 to 100,000 years.

BISMARCK, N.D. — The first person to spot it was a shovel operator working the overnight shift, eyeing a glint of white as he scooped up a giant mound of dirt and dropped it into a dump truck.

Later, after the truck driver dumped the load, a dozer driver was ready to flatten the dirt but stopped for a closer look when he, too, spotted that bit of white.

Only then did the miners realize they had unearthed something special: a 7-foot-long mammoth tusk that had been buried for thousands of years.

“We were very fortunate, lucky to find what we found,” said David Straley, an executive of North American Coal, which owns the mine.

The miners unearthed the tusk from an old streambed, about 40 feet (12.1 meters) deep, at the Freedom Mine near Beulah, North Dakota. The 45,000-acre (18,210-hectare) surface mine produces up to 16 million tons (14.5 million metric tons) of lignite coal per year.

After spotting the tusk, the crews stopped digging in the area and called in experts, who estimated it to be 10,000 to 100,000 years old.


Wooly Mammoths in North Dakota
Posted by MorbidTheClown
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2015
66395 posts
Posted on 1/8/24 at 3:30 pm to
Posted by redstick13
Lower Saxony
Member since Feb 2007
38617 posts
Posted on 1/8/24 at 3:31 pm to
Is this like when Mark Wahlberg found a dinosaur tooth on Deepwater Horizon?
Posted by dgnx6
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
68943 posts
Posted on 1/8/24 at 3:32 pm to
Climate change
Posted by Bluefin
The Banana Stand
Member since Apr 2011
13264 posts
Posted on 1/8/24 at 3:34 pm to
quote:

10,000 to 100,000 years old

Crazy how they're able to just narrow it down like that
Posted by papz
Austin, TX
Member since Jul 2008
9330 posts
Posted on 1/8/24 at 3:44 pm to
They found an intact baby mammoth on an episode of Gold Rush last week. They sold it to the government for 2 million.
Posted by ATXTiger64
Member since Jul 2006
815 posts
Posted on 1/8/24 at 3:51 pm to
quote:

shovel operator


I don't know why but this made me laugh. I know they are calling some piece of heavy machinery "a shovel." I just imagine someone down there digging with a hand held shovel and being called an operator lol.
This post was edited on 1/8/24 at 3:56 pm
Posted by mtntiger
Asheville, NC
Member since Oct 2003
26666 posts
Posted on 1/8/24 at 4:23 pm to
quote:

has been buried for an estimated 10,000 to 100,000 years.



That's a pretty wide spread. Shouldn't they have a pretty good idea of the age of the earth they're digging in or is that a 'narrow' range for these types of things?
Posted by etm512
Mandeville, LA
Member since Aug 2005
20760 posts
Posted on 1/8/24 at 4:25 pm to
quote:

and called in experts, who estimated it to be 10,000 to 100,000 years old.


Good thing they called in the experts who were able to give that very informed estimate
Posted by viv1d
Member since Aug 2017
1618 posts
Posted on 1/8/24 at 4:32 pm to
That dude in Alaska has 1000s of these in his backyard
Posted by Marciano1
Marksville, LA
Member since Jun 2009
18473 posts
Posted on 1/8/24 at 5:02 pm to
quote:

estimated 10,000 to 100,000 years

Posted by jeffsdad
Member since Mar 2007
21497 posts
Posted on 1/8/24 at 5:23 pm to
Its hard to realize just how big those suckers were. I'm 6'2" and could not touch the bottom of the tusk of one in Los Angeles' museum.
Posted by LegendInMyMind
Member since Apr 2019
54915 posts
Posted on 1/8/24 at 5:27 pm to
Do they slow down or halt operations when a discovery like this is made? Maybe give Indiana Jones and crew a chance to check for more fossils?
Posted by PurpleandGold Motown
Birmingham, Alabama
Member since Oct 2007
22064 posts
Posted on 1/8/24 at 6:22 pm to
quote:

10,000 to 100,000 years old.


Such a precise estimate. Do they moonlight as contractors on the weekends?

All jokes aside, that's pretty cool, but I'm excited to see when they reintroduce mammoths to Siberia in a few years.
Posted by CrazyTigerFan
Osaka
Member since Nov 2003
3298 posts
Posted on 1/8/24 at 10:37 pm to
Just to try and help explain a few reasons why the dating range may seem so large (some of which has been mentioned already in this thread), in case anyone cares:

- There are multiple methods used for dating different types of objects

- Different methods can be used for dating plant and animal remains (organic materials) compared to inorganic materials

- 100,000 years is a very small period of time on a geological time scale (this is usually more relevant for methods used with inorganic materials)

- Radiocarbon dating and other methods that use radioactive decay / half-lives are generally less accurate the more recently the object was deposited

- Certain ranges of time are inherently more inaccurate than other ranges of time when using radioactive decay / half-lives based on natural events that impacted background amounts of particular elements, such as Carbon

I didn't read the study associated with this find, so I don't know which factor(s) played a part in this dating range, but the things mentioned above can generally affect dating ranges.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram