Started By
Message
re: A&M fans on twitter trying to say that Jimbo had a better first 3 years than Sark
Posted on 1/2/24 at 12:37 pm to geauxnavybeatbama
Posted on 1/2/24 at 12:37 pm to geauxnavybeatbama
To be honest, it’s probably about the same? We finished 4th after bowl season that year and the longhorns will probably finish 4-6 this year when it’s all over. A bowl win does sound a little better than a bowl loss, but in the final rankings it’s probably a wash.
I’m surprised yall haven’t even argued conference championships. Sark has 1 now to Jimbo’s 0. By that metric he is a better coach after 3 years. But again, this graphic was more of a laugh by the A&M good bull hunting guys because they knew people like you would get their panties in a wad over it.
I’m surprised yall haven’t even argued conference championships. Sark has 1 now to Jimbo’s 0. By that metric he is a better coach after 3 years. But again, this graphic was more of a laugh by the A&M good bull hunting guys because they knew people like you would get their panties in a wad over it.
This post was edited on 1/2/24 at 12:38 pm
2
Posted on 1/2/24 at 12:43 pm to Texas Gentleman
Bingo,
Would any Texas fan rather trade their coach/success for A&M's over the last 3 years?
Would any Texas fan rather trade their coach/success for A&M's over the last 3 years?
Posted on 1/2/24 at 12:51 pm to Texas Gentleman
quote:
To be honest, it’s probably about the same? We finished 4th after bowl season that year and the longhorns will probably finish 4-6 this year when it’s all over.
A&M absolutely should have been in the playoff that year. Ohio State media/political machine took the spot with 6 total wins, and the strongest win being over Northwestern.
Absurd that Ohio State with 6 weak arse wins got that spot over A&M.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News