Well, being that simple math when comparing those two via the stats posted shows that indeed, 26 wins > 25 (and Jimbo had a season shortened by covid), 2 top 10 wins > 1, and 3 bowl wins including a NY6 bowl > 0.... statistically yes, Jimbo was a better coach.

Now we can debate all we want what Sark's future will be and will he be better than Jimbo over the next 3 years. But statistically Jimbo had a better record in everything posted in that picture. Do you disagree with facts, or just hate A&M so much you got rustled by a simple graphic and cant get past it?

3 ...

Report Post

Posted by geauxnavybeatbama

Member since Jul 2013

25134 posts

Posted on 1/2/24 at 12:32 pm to Texas Gentleman

quote:
But statistically Jimbo had a better record in everything posted in that picture. Do you disagree with facts, or just hate A&M so much you got rustled by a simple graphic and cant get past it?

no. you are correct with everything in that photo. So you think losing in the CFP is worse than winning the orange bowl in the covid year?

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by Chalkywhite84

New orleans

Member since Dec 2016

27361 posts

Posted on 1/2/24 at 12:40 pm to Texas Gentleman

I hate to defend Texas and sark but it is true that he is on the upswing.

They are getting some great players recruiting high school and the portal.

Sark will always have a great offense at Texas.

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by Shea Vinnerbush

Austin, TX

Member since Sep 2023

2162 posts

Posted on 1/2/24 at 2:42 pm to Texas Gentleman

quote:
statistically yes, Jimbo was a better coach.

"Sure Jimbo never came remotely close to winning a conference title or appearing in the CFP, but look at his dang TaxSlayer and Texas Bowl record! Money well spent if you ask me!"

If Jimbo was so much better than a CFP head coach, how come A&M spent $77 million to get rid of him?

1 ...

Report Post

SEC Rant - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board