Started By
Message
re: A&M fans on twitter trying to say that Jimbo had a better first 3 years than Sark
Posted on 1/2/24 at 12:21 pm to Texas Gentleman
Posted on 1/2/24 at 12:21 pm to Texas Gentleman
no the numbers aren't wrong. do you think Jimbo had more success at A&M than Sark has had at Texas?
2
Posted on 1/2/24 at 12:22 pm to geauxnavybeatbama
Fisher is gone. Sark will be in the next couple of years after a few more chokes in the games that matter
Posted on 1/2/24 at 12:27 pm to geauxnavybeatbama
Well, being that simple math when comparing those two via the stats posted shows that indeed, 26 wins > 25 (and Jimbo had a season shortened by covid), 2 top 10 wins > 1, and 3 bowl wins including a NY6 bowl > 0.... statistically yes, Jimbo was a better coach.
Now we can debate all we want what Sark's future will be and will he be better than Jimbo over the next 3 years. But statistically Jimbo had a better record in everything posted in that picture. Do you disagree with facts, or just hate A&M so much you got rustled by a simple graphic and cant get past it?
Now we can debate all we want what Sark's future will be and will he be better than Jimbo over the next 3 years. But statistically Jimbo had a better record in everything posted in that picture. Do you disagree with facts, or just hate A&M so much you got rustled by a simple graphic and cant get past it?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News