quote:
The SEC teams will already receive 100 million per team from the TV deal. The only teams of value that wouldn't dilute the payout would be the Virginia and North Carolina schools.

Clemson, FSU, and Miami have no shot at the SEC. It's not a charity conference. If it doesn't make dollars then it doesn't make sense.

I guarantee you that there would be higher tv ratings for Clemson, FSU, & Miami games than for Virginia & North Carolina games.

This isn't 2012 when tv markets was the biggest factor. Now it's about what teams improve your overall tv package which is based on the value of the games being offered.

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by Diego Ricardo

Alabama

Member since Dec 2020

6010 posts

Posted on 12/22/23 at 12:13 pm to Bamatab

quote:
I guarantee you that there would be higher tv ratings for Clemson, FSU, & Miami games than for Virginia & North Carolina games. This isn't 2012 when tv markets was the biggest factor. Now it's about what teams improve your overall tv package which is based on the value of the games being offered.

I don’t understand why this has to be explained to people repetitively on here. Cable carriage is not the primary concern with expansion anymore.

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by tide06

Member since Oct 2011

11285 posts

Posted on 12/22/23 at 2:34 pm to Bamatab

quote:
I guarantee you that there would be higher tv ratings for Clemson, FSU, & Miami games than for Virginia & North Carolina games.

This isn't 2012 when tv markets was the biggest factor. Now it's about what teams improve your overall tv package which is based on the value of the games being offered.

UNC and UVA fans don't watch football.

There arent any games in the last few years where they were a major draw.

Clemson, FSU and to a much, much larger degree ND are different stories.

1 ...

Report Post

SEC Rant - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board