re: The committee got it wrong! Ala losing to Michigan will prove it, Ga is the better team

Committee did not select best 4 teams and did not select the most deserving because the CFP is a beauty contest. Always has been. UGA had its chance and Alabama played a better game. UGA is, without any reasonable doubt, one of the best 4 if not THE best team….but the CFP is not about selecting the best teams. They get a pass, from me at least for what it’s worth, with UGA. UGA lost. FSU is not one of the best 4 teams in the country with their starting QB. They are, however, an undefeated Power 5 conference champion. The ACC is a joke, everyone knows it, but no more so than the Big 12 and about on par with the big 10. The PAC 12 is not even a joke…it no longer even exists, the 2 teams that played in their conference championship are Big 10 teams now. Or will be in a few months. Washington is a 3 loss team in the big 10 or the SEC. Michigan is at least a 2 game loser in the SEC. NONE of this matters….the CFP has NEVER been about best or most deserving…it’s always been about storylines and TV. And it probably should be given that CFB is and always has been on par with Olympic gymnastics and diving in that it’s all about the subjective opinion of the judges. It is and always has been. Consider that every year for nearly 150 years there has been, on average, 2.3 “national” champions each year in CFB. You can’t have 2 best teams every season and be anything other than an exhibition or pastime. Someone, most likely Alabama, wins the “Natty” this year and their fans will rightfully brag about it just like all those 2.3 teams a year have done for nearly 150 years. It’s still a good way to waste a Saturday in the fall.