Started By
Message

Top four conference champs get byes .

Posted on 12/8/23 at 11:42 am
Posted by MOJO_ERASER
Tulsa Oklahoma
Member since Jun 2017
5839 posts
Posted on 12/8/23 at 11:42 am
Imo they will need to change this rule fast. Your basically going to have half the teams on the bye who have no realistic chance of winning a nc and 5-11 will be beating the shite out of each other to get to play a game vs a inferior opponent . Going to see a lot of big ten sec games or sec vs sec in that range .
This post was edited on 12/8/23 at 11:43 am
Posted by Jrv2damac
Kanorado
Member since Mar 2004
65719 posts
Posted on 12/8/23 at 11:44 am to
quote:

Going to see a lot of big ten sec games or sec vs sec in that range .


Good
Posted by MNW
Starkville, MS
Member since Mar 2015
1838 posts
Posted on 12/8/23 at 11:46 am to
quote:

Imo they will need to change this rule fast. Your basically going to have half the teams on the bye who have no realistic chance of winning a nc and 5-11 will be beating the shite out of each other to get to play a game vs a inferior opponent .


I like it, keeps conference championship games very important.
Posted by ColoradoAg
Colorado
Member since Sep 2011
22440 posts
Posted on 12/8/23 at 11:47 am to
quote:

Imo they will need to change this rule fast. Your basically going to have half the teams on the bye who have no realistic chance of winning a nc and 5-11 will be beating the shite out of each other to get to play a game vs a inferior opponent . Going to see a lot of big ten sec games or sec vs sec in that range .
I don't see why you care. OU will never be a T4 team - they aren't a rich blue-blood program.
Posted by Rip N Lip
What does my VPN say?
Member since Jul 2019
5227 posts
Posted on 12/8/23 at 11:53 am to
quote:

Your basically going to have half the teams on the bye who have no realistic chance of winning a nc and 5-11 will be beating the shite out of each other to get to play a game vs a inferior opponent . Going to see a lot of big ten sec games or sec vs sec in that range .


This was the intent of expansion all along, and only whiney-arse dipshits worried about”fairness” could see it. It’s why they didn’t expand to six (perfect) or 8 (approaching too many here, still >>> 12) first.
Posted by WG_Dawg
Hoover
Member since Jun 2004
86598 posts
Posted on 12/8/23 at 11:58 am to
quote:

our basically going to have half the teams on the bye who have no realistic chance of winning a nc


Only like 3-4 teams every single year have a "realistic" chance of winning. If you desperately desire to change something we can start by not having 12 fricking teams in it.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter