Started By
Message
re: Did the networks have anything to do with the decision?
Posted on 12/3/23 at 1:34 pm to 304tiger
Posted on 12/3/23 at 1:34 pm to 304tiger
Wouldn’t including a team like FSU be *better* for the ratings? I thought the whole thing was “Bama fatigue” ruining the sport and ratings?
This post was edited on 12/3/23 at 1:35 pm
3
Posted on 12/3/23 at 1:37 pm to TouchdownAlabama
Including a team with a 3rd string QB would be bad for ratings… also, this will be the first time Bama and Michigan have played with their current big brand coaches. It will be a big watch.
Posted on 12/3/23 at 1:45 pm to TouchdownAlabama
Im not watching that shite
Posted on 12/3/23 at 2:01 pm to TouchdownAlabama
quote:
Wouldn’t including a team like FSU be *better* for the ratings? I thought the whole thing was “Bama fatigue” ruining the sport and ratings?
I'll eat my crow, I didn't think the gumps would win and I don't think they should have been put in over FSU.
But as far as network ratings, FSU fans travel, they have a big fanbase throughout Florida and the southeast, and they have the "Cinderella" season/adversity angle. I don't think it was a ratings call. But now that crow is eaten, FSU got fricked over in major fashion and I hope Michigan steps up. We will see.
Larger team playoff cant get here fast enough.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News