Started By
Message
re: Missouri's Eli Drinkwitz asking some pretty good questions about expansion...
Posted on 8/6/23 at 11:25 pm to PerrillouxToTexas
Posted on 8/6/23 at 11:25 pm to PerrillouxToTexas
quote:
And we could do that because the schools voted to retain their 3rd tier media properties, enabling initiatives like LHN. You or any other school could've done the same. And that revenue distribution model was voted on by Texas, Texas A&M, Nebraska, Oklahoma + at least 3 other schools. Hypocrites in bold.
Missouri was against that from the start. It was Nebraska basking in their former glory who thought they would benefit from unequal sharing. Texasschools got in line and OU did what its daddy said.
1
Posted on 8/6/23 at 11:55 pm to Tackle74
quote:
And we could do that because the schools voted to retain their 3rd tier media properties, enabling initiatives like LHN. You or any other school could've done the same. And that revenue distribution model was voted on by Texas, Texas A&M, Nebraska, Oklahoma + at least 3 other schools. Hypocrites in bold.
Missouri was against that from the start. It was Nebraska basking in their former glory who thought they would benefit from unequal sharing. Texasschools got in line and OU did what its daddy said.
I remember PAC 12 wanted Texas to drop the LHN before joining the PAC 12. Texas wouldn't do it.
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News