Started By
Message
re: SEC reaction to Wash - Oregon to Big 10
Posted on 8/4/23 at 2:35 pm to JeffLebowski
Posted on 8/4/23 at 2:35 pm to JeffLebowski
We'd only take the FSU's (to my dismay) and Clemson's of the world. The top tiers of a conference. Otherwise, no, we're not going to expand just to expand.
Looking at the Big 10 now, there are several tiers as far as value:
1st tier
Ohio State
Michigan
Penn State
USC
2nd tier
Wisconsin
Oregon
UCLA
Nebraska
3rd tier
Purdue
Minnesota
Indiana
Illinois
Northwestern
Washington
Maryland
Iowa
Michigan State
4th tier
Rutgers
The ACC looks like this:
1st tier
FSU
Clemson
2nd tier
Miami
UNC
Duke
3rd tier
NC State
Duke
Virginia
Virginia Tech
4th tier
Pitt
Louisville
Wake Forest
Boston College
Georgia Tech
Definitely some diminishing returns if we choose to expand with ACC teams.
Looking at the Big 10 now, there are several tiers as far as value:
1st tier
Ohio State
Michigan
Penn State
USC
2nd tier
Wisconsin
Oregon
UCLA
Nebraska
3rd tier
Purdue
Minnesota
Indiana
Illinois
Northwestern
Washington
Maryland
Iowa
Michigan State
4th tier
Rutgers
The ACC looks like this:
1st tier
FSU
Clemson
2nd tier
Miami
UNC
Duke
3rd tier
NC State
Duke
Virginia
Virginia Tech
4th tier
Pitt
Louisville
Wake Forest
Boston College
Georgia Tech
Definitely some diminishing returns if we choose to expand with ACC teams.
Posted on 8/4/23 at 3:20 pm to ForeverGator
quote:
The ACC looks like this:
ooking at the Big 10 now, there are several tiers as far as value:
1st tier
Ohio State
Michigan
Penn State
USC
1st tier
FSU
Clemson
This is a mistake. FSU and Clemson may be first tier in the ACC, but they aren't in the same tier as the 4 Big 10 teams (or the SEC first tier). They are 2nd tier.
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News