Started By
Message
re: FSU and Clemson: does the SEC really want them?
Posted on 8/1/23 at 7:34 am to dstone12
Posted on 8/1/23 at 7:34 am to dstone12
Only reason to take them is to keep the B1G out of the South. We don’t need the additional brand names and their inclusion only makes a tough conference tougher.
Could argue that UNC and UVA would be bigger wins for us (increases the academic and basketball profile while exposing the SEC to regional states where a foothold has yet to be established)
Could argue that UNC and UVA would be bigger wins for us (increases the academic and basketball profile while exposing the SEC to regional states where a foothold has yet to be established)
1
Posted on 8/1/23 at 8:57 am to tylerdurden24
quote:
Only reason to take them is to keep the B1G out of the South
Yep that’s what I’m getting at. It’s the crux of the question.
How bad do you want FSU out of the big10. They won’t stay in floundering ACC, nor would they want to wait to find out the tv deal.
If I were Florida and I play then every year, I want them in the sec so they can avoid ACC/big10 cakewalks.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News