Started By
Message

re: Fans of the Original 10 SEC Teams

Posted on 7/31/23 at 3:16 pm to
Posted by Hardluck Harry
Member since Jul 2023
617 posts
Posted on 7/31/23 at 3:16 pm to
South Carolina and Arkansas can stay.
Posted by Pastor Mike
Florida
Member since Dec 2020
5605 posts
Posted on 7/31/23 at 3:18 pm to
Throw out Missouri and take in FSU and I am good. Missouri brings nothing to the table.
Posted by SouthernInsanity
Shadows of Death Valley
Member since Nov 2012
19465 posts
Posted on 7/31/23 at 3:19 pm to
quote:

Gun to your head name 3 Missouri players ever


Wasn't Chase Daniels from Mizzou, before they were in the SEC? And then they had the gay linebacker.
Posted by RamboMizzou
Springfield
Member since Jan 2014
10261 posts
Posted on 7/31/23 at 3:20 pm to
quote:

bootymane


Michael Sam stole this dudes boyfriend.

Posted by RamboMizzou
Springfield
Member since Jan 2014
10261 posts
Posted on 7/31/23 at 3:21 pm to
quote:

Throw out Missouri and take in FSU and I am good. Missouri brings nothing to the table.


Pastor of dick sucking.
Posted by Leto II
Arrakis
Member since Dec 2018
22731 posts
Posted on 7/31/23 at 3:22 pm to
Arkansas and South Carolina joined my freshman year and really my first year as an SEC fan, so I don’t really consider them expansion teams as it relates to me.
I’d have been fine with us stopping there.
Posted by mckibaj
Member since Nov 2010
7735 posts
Posted on 7/31/23 at 3:22 pm to
quote:

South Carolina and Arkansas can stay.


They've been in over 30 years. Only those 40+ remember a time in the SEC without them.

ETA: 12 teams was really a good number. You had 5 Division teams to play plus 1 Perm Cross Division and 2 rotating home-home series with the Cross Division teams.
This post was edited on 7/31/23 at 3:24 pm
Posted by RamboMizzou
Springfield
Member since Jan 2014
10261 posts
Posted on 7/31/23 at 3:22 pm to
quote:

Wasn't Chase Daniels from Mizzou, before they were in the SEC? And then they had the gay linebacker.


Mizzou has more successful NFL players than a lot of teams in this conference.

I understand that most here don’t know where players went to school cause their mental capacity is shite but go off.
Posted by wadewilson
Member since Sep 2009
37380 posts
Posted on 7/31/23 at 3:22 pm to
quote:

Michael Sam


That's his name!

Didn't he have down syndrome?
Posted by Tornado Alley
Member since Mar 2012
27131 posts
Posted on 7/31/23 at 3:23 pm to
quote:

Mizzou has more successful NFL players than a lot of teams in this conference.

I understand that most here don’t know where players went to school cause their mental capacity is shite but go off.



What does that have to do with college football?
Posted by RamboMizzou
Springfield
Member since Jan 2014
10261 posts
Posted on 7/31/23 at 3:26 pm to
quote:

That's his name! Didn't he have down syndrome?


Wade, don’t act like you hadn’t slid in his DM’s asking for his OF link.

As much as you “forget about Missouri”, you’d think you wouldn’t post about us so much bitch boy.
Posted by Tigerpaul1969
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Jan 2010
4529 posts
Posted on 7/31/23 at 3:27 pm to
In Mizzou's defense, they have been to as many SEC title games as Texas A&M, Ole Miss, South Carolina, Vandy, Kentucky and Miss. State combined.
Posted by wadewilson
Member since Sep 2009
37380 posts
Posted on 7/31/23 at 3:27 pm to
quote:


Wade, don’t act like you hadn’t slid in his DM’s asking for his OF link.


C'mon, this guy's gotta be a little downsy.



quote:

As much as you “forget about Missouri”, you’d think you wouldn’t post about us so much bitch boy.


I do?
Posted by RamboMizzou
Springfield
Member since Jan 2014
10261 posts
Posted on 7/31/23 at 3:27 pm to
quote:

What does that have to do with college football?


Funny your Mizzou hating arse replies to me and not the two posts I replied to about the same subject.

Did a Mizzou fan turn your moms vagina into a personal cum dispenser or something?
Posted by GentleJackJones
Member since Mar 2019
4349 posts
Posted on 7/31/23 at 3:28 pm to
1. Arkansas - absolutely felt like a SWC school. That has largely worn off, and they've earned their stripes.

2. South Carolina - For the life of me, I can't figure them out. They are an ACC-lite school (meaning, they pale in comparison to your overt ACC schools - Virginia, North Carolina, Wake Forest, Duke (basically, any school that values lacrosse and basketball over football and baseball)). I don't hate having them here, but for whatever reason, I still think Clemson is a better "cultural fit" for the SEC.

3. Missouri - good riddance

4. A&M - gay

5. Oklahoma - for whatever reason, I think they'll work out. They are bar none the best football school of the bunch.

6. Texas - would have been a good fit 25, 30 years ago. Texas fans (and Austin) has changed, and not for the better.
This post was edited on 7/31/23 at 3:30 pm
Posted by RamboMizzou
Springfield
Member since Jan 2014
10261 posts
Posted on 7/31/23 at 3:29 pm to
quote:

C'mon, this guy's gotta be a little downsy.


You’re lucky he is gay or he’d easily be able to pull your wife.

quote:

I do?


6 times so far today.
Posted by Scoob
Near Exxon
Member since Jun 2009
21183 posts
Posted on 7/31/23 at 3:35 pm to
quote:

What are your thoughts on the six expansion teams? We know most would have preferred the SEC stayed at 10 teams, but here we are.

1. Arkansas
2. South Carolina
3. Missouri
4. Texas A&M
5. Oklahoma
6. Texas

They're generally good fits. I really don't know why they brought in Mizzou, it's an outlier geographically and culturally, and doesn't mesh that well with the other SWC/Big 12 additions, either.

They fit better with a Kansas/Nebraska/Iowa grouping. Oklahoma, I guess, is a bit of a bridge to them. I never thought Arkansas was.

Some of the newer additions need to quit chirping so much. You're in, act like you belong.
Posted by Tornado Alley
Member since Mar 2012
27131 posts
Posted on 7/31/23 at 3:38 pm to
quote:

Funny your Mizzou hating arse replies to me and not the two posts I replied to about the same subject.

Did a Mizzou fan turn your moms vagina into a personal cum dispenser or something?



First, it was irrelevance, and now, it is an attempted personal attack. Don't be mad, pal. You can't blame your school's general suckage on anyone else.
Posted by Tornado Alley
Member since Mar 2012
27131 posts
Posted on 7/31/23 at 3:39 pm to
quote:

I really don't know why they brought in Mizzou, it's an outlier geographically and culturally, and doesn't mesh that well with the other SWC/Big 12 additions, either.


Because someone convinced SEC brass "media markets" and TV revenue are in the best interest of the conference and its members. Or maybe they convinced themselves. I'm not sure.
Posted by hogminer
Bella Vista, AR.
Member since Apr 2010
9819 posts
Posted on 7/31/23 at 3:41 pm to
quote:

I have a feeling the team that has been to the most conference championships will be the least favorite


I don't think Arkansas is the least favorite.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter