Started By
Message
Compromise for an 8 game schedule: a 3-5-5 format
Posted on 6/1/23 at 4:55 pm
Posted on 6/1/23 at 4:55 pm
So, under this scheduling plan, teams would play their alternate teams five times every 12 years while still preserving three rivalries. It seems like the most optimal approach, especially if the SEC intends to stick with an 8-game schedule. Thoughts?
8
Posted on 6/1/23 at 4:55 pm to NewZou
I haven't been following too closely. Is this an option? I thought they were locked into 1-7.
Posted on 6/1/23 at 5:29 pm to NewZou
Thats 13 games. It’s a 16 team conference in 2024. How does that work?
ETA: I mean different 13 teams.
ETA: I mean different 13 teams.
This post was edited on 6/1/23 at 5:31 pm
Posted on 6/1/23 at 5:34 pm to NewZou
I’d rather see a 2-6
But a 3-5 also works for me
But a 3-5 also works for me
Posted on 6/1/23 at 5:38 pm to NewZou
Tell me who the three for everybody is first
Posted on 6/1/23 at 7:14 pm to NewZou
I’d rather see a 4-4 format, but yes. At a minimum get away from this insane “play every team in a 2 year span” that’s destroying rivalries for the sake of some weird and pointless symmetry.
Posted on 6/1/23 at 7:30 pm to NewZou
This will only be for 2 years
Posted on 6/1/23 at 7:37 pm to NewZou
Any commissioner who doesn’t preserve Georgia/Auburn and Bama/Tennessee should find a new conference to work in.
Posted on 6/2/23 at 12:31 am to NewZou
3-5-5 with 16 teams?
If you go 2-6, that drops the 13 rotating to 5x every 11 years. I know this isn't a balanced H/A format.
If you go 2-6, that drops the 13 rotating to 5x every 11 years. I know this isn't a balanced H/A format.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News