Started By
Message
re: 1 permanent rivals
Posted on 5/30/23 at 4:43 pm to Clark14
Posted on 5/30/23 at 4:43 pm to Clark14
quote:
Let aggie and mizzou play each other since they came in together and let the original members pair off.
Yep. Giving LSU a permanent of A&M is an unfair advantage for LSU. It also means Tennessee gets either Kentucky or Vanderbilt, doubly unfair.
Big 6 schools should have another Big 6 as the permanent opponent.
3
Posted on 5/30/23 at 4:51 pm to PerrillouxToTexas
quote:
Yep. Giving LSU a permanent of A&M is an unfair advantage for LSU.
Did you actually go to the bother to check TAMU vs LSU under Jimbo? I didn't think so.
Posted on 5/30/23 at 5:00 pm to PerrillouxToTexas
I think this new scheduling is going to be a negative for the SEC. I'm really going to miss playing our annual west games. Fans love to say someone is or isn't a rival to beat their chest but every team in the west has had good wins and tough loses over the years and that familiarity has been great. Changing it seems like it's going to remove all the mini rivalries the sec is known form week in and week out. If I had to pick one West school, I really would like to play every year, it would have to be LSU. Great games typically, tough, and passionate fans. I would hate to be a player and think I had to go to the dump in Missouri every other year.
Posted on 5/30/23 at 7:35 pm to PerrillouxToTexas
quote:
Giving LSU a permanent of A&M is an unfair advantage for LSU. It also means Tennessee gets either Kentucky or Vanderbilt, doubly unfair.
What's funny is everyone discussing this forgets that UT still has to play a bunch of SEC teams every season. Vandy would only be one of a bunch of SEC teams they play.
Calm your tits people
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News