Started By
Message
re: Q for the aggies...do you want Texas as a permanent...
Posted on 2/25/23 at 9:23 am to Jrtt
Posted on 2/25/23 at 9:23 am to Jrtt
quote:20-19 in the last 50 years it’s not opinion. It is a fact.
everything on there is opinion.
22-19 since A&M allowed unlimited enrollment of women is not an opinion. It is a fact.
Aggie football was awful between 1940 and the early 1970s. That is a fact. And it has as much relevance today as arguing about who won the soccer match between Padua and Milan in 1620.
This post was edited on 2/25/23 at 9:25 am
Posted on 2/25/23 at 9:27 am to AggieHank86
quote:
And it has as much relevance today
Why is it not relevant? You and I had as much to do with a game played yesterday as one played in 1900. If A&M had dominated the series pre-1970, it would surely be relevant to you.
Posted on 2/25/23 at 9:31 am to AggieHank86
Texas won a natty this century. Aggie won one as Hitler invaded Poland. You people are so delusional it’s comical. I guess this is the time of year for your annual “ this is our year” Spring natty. No one views you as a traditional football power. I see this time and time again with Aggie. Viewing a series record and adjusting the time line to make it seem competitive. a series record is what it is.
This post was edited on 2/25/23 at 9:32 am
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News