Started By
Message

re: CFP Championship Games Appearances

Posted on 1/9/23 at 8:54 am to
Posted by DirtyDawg
President of the East Cobb Snobs
Member since Aug 2013
15539 posts
Posted on 1/9/23 at 8:54 am to
quote:

Not a huge fan of a 12 team playoff but I hope it at least leads to more parity. Those Bama Clemson rematches were not good for the sport or for the average fan




Those Alabama and Clemson teams would have CLOWNED anyone else in a 12 team playoff. The 12 team playoff will be fun for those random mid-seed matchups it creates in the 1st round, but in the end there are only ever 2-3 teams a year that can actually win the title.

It's just adding extra steps to arrive at the same conclusion.
Posted by skrayper
21-0 Asterisk Drive
Member since Nov 2012
31037 posts
Posted on 1/9/23 at 10:23 am to
Alabama would have made a 12 team tournament this year.
I think they likely win that first round game, which might have made for an interesting 2nd round.

Presuming the ranking remain unchanged from the end of the regular season, Alabama would have played Washington and then I presume Ohio State?
Posted by mouse_cop
The South
Member since Aug 2019
2875 posts
Posted on 1/9/23 at 10:58 am to
quote:

Those Alabama and Clemson teams would have CLOWNED anyone else in a 12 team playoff. The 12 team playoff will be fun for those random mid-seed matchups it creates in the 1st round, but in the end there are only ever 2-3 teams a year that can actually win the title.

It's just adding extra steps to arrive at the same conclusion.


Ehhh they were the best teams but anything can happen. They play the game for a reason. Not to mention that with expanded playoffs, more kids will see that you don't need to go to a blue blood to have a chance at playing on the biggest stage. That alone may produce more parity
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
73413 posts
Posted on 1/9/23 at 11:21 am to
quote:

Those Alabama and Clemson teams would have CLOWNED anyone else in a 12 team playoff.


Would've been fun to see what Ohio State could've done in 2015 and 2018.
Posted by DawginSC
Member since Aug 2022
4625 posts
Posted on 1/10/23 at 3:21 pm to
quote:

Those Alabama and Clemson teams would have CLOWNED anyone else in a 12 team playoff. The 12 team playoff will be fun for those random mid-seed matchups it creates in the 1st round, but in the end there are only ever 2-3 teams a year that can actually win the title.

It's just adding extra steps to arrive at the same conclusion.


Yes and no.

The biggest impacts I see are:

1. You have to be a conference champion to get a first round bye. This would mean UGA would have had to play an extra game than Bama last year, and bama would have to play one more than UGA in 2017. That can have a big impact on injury situations by the time these teams meet up in the playoff that might make results different.

2. Teams that are extremely talented but have stumbles during the season are still in play. UGA in 2012 for example wasn't in the top 4 after the SECCG loss to Bama, but would have been in the top 12 and may have been the only team capable of beating Bama that year. Bama this year could have been dangerous. A couple of those OSU teams that had early mistakes but gained steam during the season could have caused problems.

3. Injuries in general. These will be 3-4 games of playoffs. A key performer goes down due to an extra game... that could seriously impact some teams. Particularly some of those teams that really were/are QB dominated. Bama this year (their backup after Young looked shaky). Those clemson teams with Watson and Lawrence. While injuries are a constant... with more games you'll have more injuries.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter