re: Auburn did not storm the court

quote:

---

I’m not sure why there’s any confusion after that.

---

Well we’re surprised by your confusion. I’ll try one more time. Most of us aren’t focused on the past, particularly if said past is marked by indisputable mediocrity. OP seems to imply that if Party A celebrates mediocrity in one instance, then it would be utterly shocking if Party B does not celebrate mediocrity in another instance. I find this line of thinking to be irrational. Not sure what you’re hung up on here?