Started By
Message
re: Why do gumps think they're gonna be able to compete in NIL indefinitely?
Posted on 1/1/23 at 9:02 pm to BurntOrangeMan
Posted on 1/1/23 at 9:02 pm to BurntOrangeMan
quote:
Imagine comparing bag money to the assets of major markets, corporations & university collectives in a historical reference vs the current NCAA/NIL world.
It’s not a question of if, rather a question of when the shift in landscape takes place. There are scenarios that could take place that end a few legacy programs & establish others that have never been national powers.
It won’t happen overnight, but follow the money & the long term factors that drive a programs revenue potential. Things will change, some will adapt & others simply will not have the natural assets to sustain their current success.
If there is any debate it centers around one’s definition of short & long term.
Sad but true, $ fricks up everything.
See my post right above this
1
Posted on 1/1/23 at 9:25 pm to TideFaninFl
quote:
See my post right above this
That’s a popular theory over here. Doesn’t hold water though. Our best years came with the most helicopter big boosters.
Texas’ failures have come when the University administration gets involved & when their ADept turned into a mini Capitol Hill/D.C..
Poor coaching hires/budgets, focus on revenue without reinvesting into the program & a delusional attempt to become Stanford.
Texas is not an oil money program either, the University & it’s PUF/AUF is but that’s unrelated to athletics.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News