Started By
Message
0
Posted on 12/31/22 at 10:01 pm to coolpapaboze
I 100% agree with no targeting there. Led with shoulder.
TCU earlier, that was leading with the crown.
TCU earlier, that was leading with the crown.
Posted on 12/31/22 at 10:01 pm to Spaniard
OSU 38
Uga 24
Uga 24
Posted on 12/31/22 at 10:01 pm to CrimsonTideMD
td would have been ball game.
keeping georgia in it
keeping georgia in it
Posted on 12/31/22 at 10:01 pm to TiptonInSC
so fricking dumb. what's he suppose to do? let him catch the ball for a TD?
Posted on 12/31/22 at 10:01 pm to Atlbear16
Come again?
Posted on 12/31/22 at 10:01 pm to Highthoughts
quote:
It doesn’t matter if you lead with the shoulder if you hit a defenseless player in the head or neck area.
How has this rule been out for almost 10 years and people still not understand it?
You'd have a point if there was any possible way to call it without any ambiguity, but there isn't.
The problem with the rule is it is counter to every aspect of the game itself.
It's a dog shite call for a ton of reasons, but most of all because what the frick else is he supposed to do there.
Posted on 12/31/22 at 10:01 pm to tigersaint14
Bad call. That’s a high hit to the head
Posted on 12/31/22 at 10:01 pm to dcbl
lol
Posted on 12/31/22 at 10:02 pm to NWLATigerFan12
It wasn’t targeting but leading with the shoulder doesn’t matter on a defenseless player. Jesus.
Posted on 12/31/22 at 10:02 pm to LSUShock
That’s bullshite
Posted on 12/31/22 at 10:02 pm to TiptonInSC
I’m ok with that. The targeting rule sucks anyways
Posted on 12/31/22 at 10:02 pm to wertheimer
So y’all got any of them voodoo miracles from Savannah you can pull?
Posted on 12/31/22 at 10:02 pm to JohnnyBob
I didn't think it was targeting, but I'm shocked they overturned the call.
Posted on 12/31/22 at 10:02 pm to Highthoughts
quote:
How has this rule been out for almost 10 years and people still not understand it?
Because there is ZERO consistency with how the penalty is called. Called against Arkansas when the defender actually dislodged the football with his helmet (therefore not making forceable contact with the crown of the helmet), but NOT called against TCU in what would be a textbook definition against Michigan earlier. The better question is how do the replay booths and rules officials still not understand the rule?
Posted on 12/31/22 at 10:02 pm to Cut me Mick
Still plenty of time
Posted on 12/31/22 at 10:02 pm to wertheimer
quote:
PAC 12 crew has ZERO BUSINESS officiating a game like this
Technically, them and ACC are the only major conferences who don't have a dog in the fight. I think those two should have been calling both games. Kinda BS that the SEC refs could possibly influence the TCU/Michigan game, who Georgia could play the winner of.
This post was edited on 12/31/22 at 10:04 pm
Posted on 12/31/22 at 10:02 pm to higgs_boson
Oh my
Posted on 12/31/22 at 10:02 pm to MeatPants
Game! UGA might actually be home to see the ball drop and enjoy the L.
Posted on 12/31/22 at 10:02 pm to Inadvertent Whistle
Stetson will turn it over this drive. He’ll be pressing
Page 60 of 108
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News