Started By
Message

re: Bama hate/fatigue

Posted on 12/4/22 at 9:03 pm to
Posted by TideWarrior
Asheville/Chapel Hill NC
Member since Sep 2009
11841 posts
Posted on 12/4/22 at 9:03 pm to
quote:

This was done politically for the Big 10, which was shite this year.


TCU was in regardless of the outcome of their game. So at that point it was about matchups based on the seeds and they did want a rematch of a game from the week prior.

quote:

Essentially, USC was punished for the Big10’s benefit while TCU wasn’t


USC ended up with 2 losses where TCU only had 1 loss while keeping it close.

quote:

However, the teams ahead of us that needed to lose


Did the committee come out say that? I do not recall it outside of some media(most did not) and fans speculating UA would get in.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter