Started By
Message
re: Is this not the definition of targeting?
Posted on 11/15/22 at 11:29 am to Deacon Reds
Posted on 11/15/22 at 11:29 am to Deacon Reds
The target call is ruining the game. Defenders don't have a chance.... the laws of physics still apply.
frick targeting, let them play! If its a dirty hit fine, those are easily recognizable.. tackling someone 3 inches to high isn't targeting, but it is often called. It's BS.
frick targeting, let them play! If its a dirty hit fine, those are easily recognizable.. tackling someone 3 inches to high isn't targeting, but it is often called. It's BS.
2
Posted on 11/15/22 at 11:30 am to cmayes56
It is bad coaching, to be honest.
Keep your head up and you probably will never have to worry.
It isn't a shocker that the best team in tackling (UGA) does not struggle with dropping our head. We get our head across the defender with eyes up.
Keep your head up and you probably will never have to worry.
It isn't a shocker that the best team in tackling (UGA) does not struggle with dropping our head. We get our head across the defender with eyes up.
Posted on 11/15/22 at 11:57 am to cmayes56
quote:
The target call is ruining the game. Defenders don't have a chance.... the laws of physics still apply.
frick targeting, let them play! If its a dirty hit fine, those are easily recognizable.. tackling someone 3 inches to high isn't targeting, but it is often called. It's BS.
They should have an exception for the targeting rules when players are trying to fight for extra yards or fall forward/dive. Impossible to tackle in a situation like that without meeting the pad level of the offensive player and it would eliminate weird melts like this one.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News