Started By
Message

re: Is this not the definition of targeting?

Posted on 11/14/22 at 2:59 pm to
Posted by 3down10
Member since Sep 2014
22951 posts
Posted on 11/14/22 at 2:59 pm to
Downvoted for still image.

If you want to make a case, a gif should be a minimum requirement. Still images are like cherry picked stats that 100% ignore context.
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
65490 posts
Posted on 11/14/22 at 3:07 pm to
quote:

If you want to make a case, a gif should be a minimum requirement. Still images are like cherry picked stats that 100% ignore context.


here are the gifs I could find

To me, Tennessee guy is just trying to make a normal tackle and Bennett dips his head right before the contact, causing incidental helmet to helmet contact. He's not a defenseless player, and the Tennessee defender does not initiate contact with the crown of his helmet. The no-call was the correct call there.

Most of the force on that play was the Tennessee's defender's shoulder and Bennett's shoulder/back


This post was edited on 11/14/22 at 3:15 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter