Started By
Message
re: Is this not the definition of targeting?
Posted on 11/14/22 at 2:06 pm to meansonny
Posted on 11/14/22 at 2:06 pm to meansonny
quote:
Agree to disagree.
Facemask down and the contact is the crown (top of the helmet).
Remember. This is to prevent neck injuries to the defender.
There's no "agree to disagree" here... you're viewing this through black and red glasses. The officials reviewed it and there are plenty of incredibly clear angles and photos of the hit. The NCAA clarified what the "crown" of the helmet is specifically so hits like this wouldn't be targeting.
If this is targeting then there would be 10-15 targeting penalties per game as runners fight for an extra yard or two at the end of runs.
This post was edited on 11/14/22 at 2:19 pm
1
Posted on 11/15/22 at 9:54 am to ALhunter
quote:
If this is targeting then there would be 10-15 targeting penalties per game as runners fight for an extra yard or two at the end of runs.
Your team is Auburn.
You are poorly coached and poorly disciplined.
Of course you would think this. Lol
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News