Started By
Message
re: Is this not the definition of targeting?
Posted on 11/14/22 at 12:50 pm to meansonny
Posted on 11/14/22 at 12:50 pm to meansonny
quote:
Defenseless redefines the requirements for targeting. It makes it an easier call (only needs 1 indicator).
Yeah. I don't think you know how to read rules correctly. Ask someone who practices law on how to read this stuff. It is not your thing.
Posted on 11/14/22 at 12:57 pm to PeleofAnalytics
quote:
Yeah. I don't think you know how to read rules correctly. Ask someone who practices law on how to read this stuff. It is not your thing.
He could be wrong.
But the booth ref addressed "defenseless" during the telecast.
It doesn't matter with the 3 indicators.
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/SR_Icon.jpg)