re: Is this not the definition of targeting?

quote:

---

All I’m saying is I don’t think it was targeting and that’s how it was called

---

Other angle showed contact to the shoulder and body.

It was a good no-call.

Nothing from this photo or this sideline angle would refute the call, though. I've watched this play a dozen times over from multiple angles. Every angle on the sideline looks bad. All other angles does not.

It was a good review and good noncall.