Started By
Message
re: Is this not the definition of targeting?
Posted on 11/14/22 at 12:28 pm to TigerLunatik
Posted on 11/14/22 at 12:28 pm to TigerLunatik
quote:
What? It's the main thing that is relevant to the penalty.
You are going to have to prove this one
1
Posted on 11/14/22 at 12:30 pm to djsdawg
quote:
No player shall target and make forcible contact to the head or neck area of a defenseless opponent with the helmet, forearm, hand, fist, elbow or shoulder. This foul requires that there be at least one indicator of targeting.
If the player was defenseless any contact to the head or neck area would be targeting. If the player isn't defenseless then the defender has to use a very small and specific area of the helmet to be called for targeting.
This post was edited on 11/14/22 at 12:32 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News