Started By
Message
re: ESPN just fine without the big 10
Posted on 8/24/22 at 8:29 pm to WhaddupDawg
Posted on 8/24/22 at 8:29 pm to WhaddupDawg
IMO, the biggest difference between the SEC and Big10 in football is that the SEC has had 6 different teams win a NC while the Big10 has had 1.
The Big10 is also full of garbage football programs: see Rutgers, Maryland, Nebraska, Minnesota, Indiana, Purdue, Northwestern.
Rank both conference teams in a list and pair them against each other (Bama-Ohio State; UGA-Mich, etc). PLay the games at neutral sites. SEC teams would win a majority of those games EVERY year.
The Big10 is also full of garbage football programs: see Rutgers, Maryland, Nebraska, Minnesota, Indiana, Purdue, Northwestern.
Rank both conference teams in a list and pair them against each other (Bama-Ohio State; UGA-Mich, etc). PLay the games at neutral sites. SEC teams would win a majority of those games EVERY year.
3
Posted on 8/24/22 at 8:38 pm to GeorgeWest
The Big10 is not even the 2nd best conference if comparing national titles since the BCS era. The ACC more national titles and has had more teams to win a title than the Big10 has.
Posted on 8/24/22 at 9:16 pm to GeorgeWest
You all are so sweet. You guys keep bringing up all of your titles in every other post and good for you but the people who matter will always view the B1G as 1 and the SEC as 2. The B1G is an A+ while the SEC is a B. And no matter how you respond the networks paying the B1G more proves that is right.
Posted on 8/25/22 at 7:11 am to GeorgeWest
quote:
Rank both conference teams in a list and pair them against each other (Bama-Ohio State; UGA-Mich, etc). PLay the games at neutral sites. SEC teams would win a majority of those games EVERY year.
What a great idea. It's almost like someone should've thought of this before
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News