Started By
Message
re: So when ND joins the B1G, the B1G will have more blue bloods than the SEC
Posted on 8/23/22 at 8:41 pm to Tiger2tiger97
Posted on 8/23/22 at 8:41 pm to Tiger2tiger97
Doesn't matter they've made up 54% of all titles.
4
Posted on 8/23/22 at 8:55 pm to Lord Asano
quote:
Doesn't matter they've made up 54% of all titles.
Yes they dominated the pre integration era pretty thoroughly.
Of course that was almost 60 years ago.
Bama has won more NC since 1960 than your entire conference combined and most of those were by a team (Nebraska) who wasn’t even a member yet and hasn’t won anything since 1995.
In the last 15 years the B10 has one title compared to the SEC with 11.
Maybe it’s best not to come around here barking about blue bloods when all of yours outside of Ohio State are retired at this point?
Posted on 8/24/22 at 7:41 am to Lord Asano
quote:
Doesn't matter they've made up 54% of all titles.
Really?
Using your theory
28 MNC's for Team A
27 MNC's for Team B
12 MNC's for Team C
6 MNC's for Team D
5 MNC's for Team E
1 MNC for Team F
1 MNC for team G
That is 80 MNC's for 1 conference alone but even though they are still playing today, nobody seriously considers them football blue bloods today. Ask any person on the street to name a football blue blood and I am guessing not 1 single Ivy League school will be mentioned.
Posted on 8/24/22 at 8:31 am to Lord Asano
quote:
Doesn't matter
What teams have done the last two-three decades doesn't matter?
Posted on 8/24/22 at 2:29 pm to Lord Asano
That’s why the big 10 will always be second to the SEC. They rely too much on history. The casual fan and recruits doesn’t care about what happened 50+ years ago. Yale has 18, Harvard has 8, Princeton has 15. They are blue bloods. Where are they now?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News