Started By
Message
re: Dodge Chargers ain’t gonna cut it anymore
Posted on 6/8/22 at 5:52 pm to 3down10
Posted on 6/8/22 at 5:52 pm to 3down10
"As I said, you guys will report yourself. All NIL deals have to be approved by the NCAA. And you have done exactly that. Sankey has said directly, most of what they see is just pay to play, not actual NIL deals. Meaning, teams are reporting themselves."
Sankey never said A&M. Nothing about A&M. That was irresponsible for him to say something like that as the SEC Commissioner.
This is no different than Ole Miss fans and Freeze saying if you have any information contact compliance. Or LSU fans saying what Wade said in court couldn't be used because the judge didn't allow it. It's always the same pattern.
Ok, this is a little embarassing for you, as it is as weak as it gets. You are trying to put a pattern to something, and you're only two data points are two buffoons (Frieze/Wade). And you are trying to say this is your proof. Ok man. That really is pretty idiotic.
Sankey never said A&M. Nothing about A&M. That was irresponsible for him to say something like that as the SEC Commissioner.
This is no different than Ole Miss fans and Freeze saying if you have any information contact compliance. Or LSU fans saying what Wade said in court couldn't be used because the judge didn't allow it. It's always the same pattern.
Ok, this is a little embarassing for you, as it is as weak as it gets. You are trying to put a pattern to something, and you're only two data points are two buffoons (Frieze/Wade). And you are trying to say this is your proof. Ok man. That really is pretty idiotic.
1
Posted on 6/8/22 at 5:58 pm to SA AG
quote:
Sankey never said A&M. Nothing about A&M. That was irresponsible for him to say something like that as the SEC Commissioner.
Yeah, it was probably Vandy. They are the ones everyone thinks was using NIL as pay to play.
quote:
Ok, this is a little embarassing for you, as it is as weak as it gets. You are trying to put a pattern to something, and you're only two data points are two buffoons (Frieze/Wade). And you are trying to say this is your proof. Ok man. That really is pretty idiotic.
You are the 3rd data point.
Although there have been many others over the years, so not really. It's just the 2 most relevant(SEC)/recent.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News