Started By
Message

re: Pre-trial McNeil piece on Auburn's 2010 season and the Felony 4

Posted on 4/3/13 at 9:13 pm to
Posted by Rig
BHM
Member since Aug 2011
41856 posts
Posted on 4/3/13 at 9:13 pm to
Oh all the lulz that have come from this article.
Posted by HailToTheChiz
Back in Auburn
Member since Aug 2010
48908 posts
Posted on 4/3/13 at 9:13 pm to
did this lady get paid to write this bullshite?

i wish auburn athletics would step up and start revoking media passes or making public statements

ive never hated our administration like i do today, we got no leadership at all
Posted by Rig
BHM
Member since Aug 2011
41856 posts
Posted on 4/3/13 at 9:14 pm to
Compliance has kept us clean. I'm not gonna complain about the way they run the program one little bit
Posted by WarSlamEagle
Manchester United Fan
Member since Sep 2011
24611 posts
Posted on 4/3/13 at 9:22 pm to
quote:

Used to follow him until I got tired of the report from the Auburn Journalism Politburo.

And what would that be? I'm just a dumb little j-school student that is planning to give my alma mater the death penalty in 10-15 years.
Posted by beatbammer
Member since Sep 2010
38011 posts
Posted on 4/3/13 at 9:23 pm to
quote:

And what would that be? I'm just a dumb little j-school student that is planning to give my alma mater the death penalty in 10-15 years.



Par for the course out of that joint... wouldn't be a surprise.

Don't expect me to wish you luck.
Posted by Rig
BHM
Member since Aug 2011
41856 posts
Posted on 4/3/13 at 9:25 pm to
What exactly is your sample size? Tweets on twitter from the past and a story from 1 AUJRNL grad?
Posted by beatbammer
Member since Sep 2010
38011 posts
Posted on 4/3/13 at 9:28 pm to
quote:

What exactly is your sample size? Tweets on twitter from the past and a story from 1 AUJRNL grad?


Observing the track record of Auburn journalism grads over the past 50 years.

The only anomaly in that time frame? David Housel.

Other than that, their trick-knee automatic reflex is anti-Auburn.

Syracuse journo grads will come together to defend the Cuse.

Northwestern? Same.

Missouri? Don't even know.

Auburn? Anti-Auburn 99.99% of the time. I trace it back to them believing that just because they felt they had to be anti-Lowder, that meant they had to be anti-Auburn too.
Posted by WarSlamEagle
Manchester United Fan
Member since Sep 2011
24611 posts
Posted on 4/3/13 at 9:33 pm to
quote:

Par for the course out of that joint... wouldn't be a surprise.



quote:

Don't expect me to wish you luck.

Posted by WarSlamEagle
Manchester United Fan
Member since Sep 2011
24611 posts
Posted on 4/3/13 at 9:35 pm to
Bruh, if you're going to pull out a highly scientific stat like 99.99%, you're going to have to give some more examples than that.
Posted by Aubie Spr96
lolwut?
Member since Dec 2009
41075 posts
Posted on 4/3/13 at 9:35 pm to
Without specific examples where you can defend your stated position, I believe that it's bullshite.
Posted by beatbammer
Member since Sep 2010
38011 posts
Posted on 4/3/13 at 9:36 pm to
The utter joy and delight that oozed out of The Plainsman in the early 2000's when Auburn got put on SACs probation was all I needed to know about the Auburn Journalism POV.
Posted by beatbammer
Member since Sep 2010
38011 posts
Posted on 4/3/13 at 9:37 pm to
P.S. BRAVOS!!!!!
Posted by WarSlamEagle
Manchester United Fan
Member since Sep 2011
24611 posts
Posted on 4/3/13 at 9:37 pm to
Yay! More vague replies!
Posted by WDE85
Member since Nov 2012
2161 posts
Posted on 4/3/13 at 9:38 pm to
In the national spotlight again finally.
Posted by undecided
Member since May 2012
15492 posts
Posted on 4/3/13 at 9:41 pm to
quote:

@wareagleextra: Antoine Carter. RT @AC45AU: Please dont remix my words

Does it matter if all her sources recant?
Posted by undecided
Member since May 2012
15492 posts
Posted on 4/3/13 at 9:43 pm to
quote:

Auburn? Anti-Auburn 99.99% of the time. I trace it back to them believing that just because they felt they had to be anti-Lowder, that meant they had to be anti-Auburn too.

Maybe it was the whole "dismantling of the Journalism Department" thing that they are still kinda resentful of?
Posted by Warfarer
Dothan, AL
Member since May 2010
12123 posts
Posted on 4/3/13 at 9:45 pm to
quote:

Does it matter if all her sources recant?



Reading the story, I just kept thinking that every quote seemed completely out of context and cherry picked big time. Now with 2 or 3 of her sources taking a dump on her face calling her out for it, seems less legit.
Posted by WarSlamEagle
Manchester United Fan
Member since Sep 2011
24611 posts
Posted on 4/3/13 at 9:46 pm to
WE MUST BE HOMERS BRAH
Posted by beatbammer
Member since Sep 2010
38011 posts
Posted on 4/3/13 at 9:46 pm to
quote:

Maybe it was the whole "dismantling of the Journalism Department" thing that they are still kinda resentful of?


Oh, that's a good excuse for dishonest journalism.

Edited: But typical of modern journalism... "Support me and my views or we will publish a hit-piece on you!"
This post was edited on 4/3/13 at 9:48 pm
Posted by WarSlamEagle
Manchester United Fan
Member since Sep 2011
24611 posts
Posted on 4/3/13 at 9:47 pm to
Examples, man. I WANT EXAMPLES.

What was dishonest? What did they do wrong?
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter