Started By
Message
What does anybody think about this tweet?
Posted on 2/7/17 at 2:53 pm
Posted on 2/7/17 at 2:53 pm
Sark just burned bama, and went to Atlanta. There is no way this happens right?
Also I'm not sure Dan runs the kind of offense saban is trying to run now anyways. He is trying to go more Ohio state look than arkansas's look.
This post was edited on 2/7/17 at 2:55 pm
6
Posted on 2/7/17 at 3:05 pm to russellvillehog
unless you're logged into tardville you can't see the pic you posted
here it is hosted on imgur
here it is hosted on imgur
Posted on 2/7/17 at 3:07 pm to russellvillehog
He's saying Bama does whatever they want
Posted on 2/7/17 at 3:26 pm to russellvillehog
Meh, Bama has committed to the spread now and with so many spread OCs out there I'm not sure why they would try to shoehorn Enos in
Posted on 2/7/17 at 3:32 pm to Porcine Human
Actually this doesn't surprise me one bit. Bert's career here would be over if he lost Enos right now.
Posted on 2/7/17 at 3:32 pm to hawgfaninc
I actually went to tardville to see the idiots praising a D line coach they know nothing about and they didn't even have a thread.
Then I seen that tweet, and figured I'd ask a much more level headed group of people.
Then I seen that tweet, and figured I'd ask a much more level headed group of people.
Posted on 2/7/17 at 3:33 pm to russellvillehog
Everyone outside of Arkansas says those non-competes won't standup. Someone is going to challenge them at some point. Hopefully it's not Bama.
Posted on 2/7/17 at 3:35 pm to TheCheshireHog
They have stood up this whole time. If georgia/LSU didn't challenge them bama won't either.
Also like I said I don't think he wants to run a conservative pro style anymore.
Also like I said I don't think he wants to run a conservative pro style anymore.
Posted on 2/7/17 at 4:05 pm to TheCheshireHog
quote:
Everyone outside of Arkansas says those non-competes won't standup. Someone is going to challenge them at some point. Hopefully it's not Bama.
this is hard for me to understand. I am not an attorney, but contract law is evident with regards to non compete in the business world, in trademark and copyright law, etal.....
I imagine Saban wouldn't even want Bama in that legal battle. And I would imagine Varady would enable Arkansas with his donor pockets to fight tooth and nail. I am going to make a call later tonight to check on a few things...
With the new contract/salary raise Enos just received, I doubt this wholeheartedly!
Posted on 2/7/17 at 4:10 pm to TheCheshireHog
quote:
Everyone outside of Arkansas says those non-competes won't standup.
really?
Posted on 2/7/17 at 4:21 pm to hawgfaninc
Yeah go visit an LSU, Georgia or Bama board sometime when Enos is being discussed. Obviously it's a message board so take it lightly but I've seen various posters from all those locations that claim to have law backgrounds in those states say that it won't hold up if challenged. No one has actually challenged it in court though so who knows. It could just as easily be they think they're superior to Arkansas and will take what they want so they can't imagine it sticking.
This post was edited on 2/7/17 at 4:22 pm
Posted on 2/7/17 at 4:22 pm to russellvillehog
If he gets offered he's stupid not to leave. He might be comfy as an OC, but right now he has no job security. I'll get down voted, but seriously what would you do?
Posted on 2/7/17 at 4:26 pm to TheCheshireHog
Tiger rant has like 400 lawyers posting here it seems.
Posted on 2/7/17 at 4:46 pm to Woopigsooie20
I know we have at least one or two on this board. No clue what their specialities are however.
Posted on 2/7/17 at 4:48 pm to Woopigsooie20
quote:
Tiger rant has like 400 lawyers posting here it seems.
and the most intelligent one was Geaux Judge...
Posted on 2/7/17 at 4:49 pm to TheCheshireHog
I can say with 100% certainty, that if Dan wants to go, he will be able to go.
Posted on 2/7/17 at 5:24 pm to russellvillehog
I love this mentality that somehow Bama has elite lawyers above any others, because law success = football success. Do these people that believe this shite think we don't have high level lawyers ourselves or what? Or is it just the Bama intimidation factor, like they automatically psych out their opponents on the field AND in the court of law? But but but they're Bama, they get to do whatever they want!
As far as contracts go they're pretty cut and dry. As long as both parties sign their name to it and there's no hidden or intentionally confusion verbiage, viola it's a binding contract.
As far as contracts go they're pretty cut and dry. As long as both parties sign their name to it and there's no hidden or intentionally confusion verbiage, viola it's a binding contract.
Posted on 2/7/17 at 5:35 pm to RazorBroncs
No it's the fact that it's Bama and this is working for Bert. Again tell me you wouldn't leave.
Posted on 2/7/17 at 5:41 pm to TheCheshireHog
quote:
Everyone outside of Arkansas says those non-competes won't standup. Someone is going to challenge them at some point. Hopefully it's not Bama.
I didn't realize the legal types around here felt that way about it.
There have been restrictive clauses in employment contracts about as long as there have been employment contracts.
These are terms conditional to the acceptance of the contract. If the coach doesn't wish to be restricted from taking a job within the conference as in this example, they simply negotiate it out or don't sign it.
The business world is full of restrictive language in their employment contracts, such as non-complete clauses, confidentiality clauses, etc.
Maybe there is some technicality involving rules pertaining specifically to state universities or some such that I'm not aware of.
Posted on 2/7/17 at 7:23 pm to PygmalionEffect
quote:
I didn't realize the legal types around here felt that way about it.
There have been restrictive clauses in employment contracts about as long as there have been employment contracts.
These are terms conditional to the acceptance of the contract. If the coach doesn't wish to be restricted from taking a job within the conference as in this example, they simply negotiate it out or don't sign it.
The business world is full of restrictive language in their employment contracts, such as non-complete clauses, confidentiality clauses, etc.
Maybe there is some technicality involving rules pertaining specifically to state universities or some such that I'm not aware of.
This is fairly spot on, one big reason a non-compete clause could become invalid is because the scope is too large. No one truly knows how it would play out in the courtroom but I don't believe these clauses are too large in scope. He is free to take an upgrade anywhere in the country (HC gig), just can't make a lateral move in the same conference. Even has the option to take anything in the NFL. To me that doesn't seem too large in scope but I wouldn't be the one making that decision and something like that is always going to be subjective to a certain extent.
Page 1 of 2
Latest Arkansas News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News