Started By
Message

Arkansas ranks next to last in SEC

Posted on 3/24/16 at 6:21 pm
Posted by Pigfeet
Ark Mods are Fascists
Member since Mar 2010
19783 posts
Posted on 3/24/16 at 6:21 pm
Chart shows which college football teams have the most success per dollar

It takes money to make football teams win games. Which college programs are the most efficient at spending and winning?




To see how much each school spent on football, I looked at data from the U.S. Department of Education. To measure on-field results, the Massey composite, an index that averages dozens of rankings including the AP Poll and computer ratings.

Sortable chart and article


Auburn is dead last in SEC



This post was edited on 3/24/16 at 6:23 pm
Posted by TheCheshireHog
Cashew Chicken Country
Member since Oct 2010
40856 posts
Posted on 3/24/16 at 6:53 pm to
Imagine how shitty we be if we didn't spend so much money. Glad to see the administration step up.
Posted by hawgfaninc
https://youtu.be/torc9P4-k5A
Member since Nov 2011
46362 posts
Posted on 3/24/16 at 6:56 pm to
No doubt
Posted by Porker Face
Midnight
Member since Feb 2012
15319 posts
Posted on 3/24/16 at 7:01 pm to
Thank God Jeff Long was on the Cfp committee!
Posted by Ray Penpillage
Western Slope
Member since Nov 2010
9409 posts
Posted on 3/24/16 at 7:36 pm to
Vandy ranks below both Arkansas and Auburn.
Posted by dbeck
Member since Nov 2014
29450 posts
Posted on 3/24/16 at 7:44 pm to
That chart also shows Mizzou doing better than Alabama in terms of efficiency.
Posted by Hogwarts
Arkansas, USA
Member since Sep 2015
18045 posts
Posted on 3/24/16 at 7:52 pm to
At least we aren't last!! Lol
Posted by Pigfeet
Ark Mods are Fascists
Member since Mar 2010
19783 posts
Posted on 3/24/16 at 8:49 pm to
quote:

Vandy ranks below both Arkansas and Auburn.


Correct, good catch, missed it
Posted by Ham Solo
Member since Apr 2015
7727 posts
Posted on 3/24/16 at 11:16 pm to
We do have the Petrino John L. Smith mess skewing that quite a bit for us. It would be interesting to see that over a period of time when we don't have a clusterfrick of a mess to deal with.
Posted by dbeck
Member since Nov 2014
29450 posts
Posted on 3/24/16 at 11:25 pm to
That whole chart is flawed. It has Oregon and OU ahead of Alabama in terms of on the field football success.

If any of these efficient teams could "overpay" and have Alabama's success they'd do it in a heartbeat.
Posted by WonderWartHawg
Member since Dec 2010
10397 posts
Posted on 3/25/16 at 12:03 am to
Might want to weight that ranking a little by applying a factor for having the toughest schedule overall from the years 2012 to present. Move the piggie slightly to the left.
Posted by murr
Texas
Member since Mar 2014
71 posts
Posted on 3/25/16 at 2:16 am to
quote:

We do have the Petrino John L. Smith mess skewing that quite a bit for us. It would be interesting to see that over a period of time when we don't have a clusterfrick of a mess to deal with.


That year required us to rebuild with two lame duck recruiting classes. CBB had a very empty cupboard to work with when he arrived and had to salvage what he could from the time left on the recruiting trail once he was hired.
Posted by VagueMessage
Fayetteville, AR
Member since Jun 2013
3901 posts
Posted on 3/25/16 at 5:46 am to
quote:

That whole chart is flawed. It has Oregon and OU ahead of Alabama in terms of on the field football success.

If any of these efficient teams could "overpay" and have Alabama's success they'd do it in a heartbeat.


Agreed. Alabama is in the red and they have four national championships in one decade. Under the same guy. If winning it all - even one time - doesn't at least put you at breaking even, then what IS success?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter