Started By
Message
Arkansas ranks next to last in SEC
Posted on 3/24/16 at 6:21 pm
Posted on 3/24/16 at 6:21 pm
Chart shows which college football teams have the most success per dollar
It takes money to make football teams win games. Which college programs are the most efficient at spending and winning?
To see how much each school spent on football, I looked at data from the U.S. Department of Education. To measure on-field results, the Massey composite, an index that averages dozens of rankings including the AP Poll and computer ratings.
Sortable chart and article
Auburn is dead last in SEC
It takes money to make football teams win games. Which college programs are the most efficient at spending and winning?
To see how much each school spent on football, I looked at data from the U.S. Department of Education. To measure on-field results, the Massey composite, an index that averages dozens of rankings including the AP Poll and computer ratings.
Sortable chart and article
Auburn is dead last in SEC
This post was edited on 3/24/16 at 6:23 pm
Posted on 3/24/16 at 6:53 pm to Pigfeet
Imagine how shitty we be if we didn't spend so much money. Glad to see the administration step up.
Posted on 3/24/16 at 7:01 pm to Pigfeet
Thank God Jeff Long was on the Cfp committee!
Posted on 3/24/16 at 7:36 pm to Pigfeet
Vandy ranks below both Arkansas and Auburn.
Posted on 3/24/16 at 7:44 pm to Pigfeet
That chart also shows Mizzou doing better than Alabama in terms of efficiency.
Posted on 3/24/16 at 7:52 pm to Pigfeet
At least we aren't last!! Lol
Posted on 3/24/16 at 8:49 pm to Ray Penpillage
quote:
Vandy ranks below both Arkansas and Auburn.
Correct, good catch, missed it
Posted on 3/24/16 at 11:16 pm to Pigfeet
We do have the Petrino John L. Smith mess skewing that quite a bit for us. It would be interesting to see that over a period of time when we don't have a clusterfrick of a mess to deal with.
Posted on 3/24/16 at 11:25 pm to Pigfeet
That whole chart is flawed. It has Oregon and OU ahead of Alabama in terms of on the field football success.
If any of these efficient teams could "overpay" and have Alabama's success they'd do it in a heartbeat.
If any of these efficient teams could "overpay" and have Alabama's success they'd do it in a heartbeat.
Posted on 3/25/16 at 12:03 am to Pigfeet
Might want to weight that ranking a little by applying a factor for having the toughest schedule overall from the years 2012 to present. Move the piggie slightly to the left.
Posted on 3/25/16 at 2:16 am to Ham Solo
quote:
We do have the Petrino John L. Smith mess skewing that quite a bit for us. It would be interesting to see that over a period of time when we don't have a clusterfrick of a mess to deal with.
That year required us to rebuild with two lame duck recruiting classes. CBB had a very empty cupboard to work with when he arrived and had to salvage what he could from the time left on the recruiting trail once he was hired.
Posted on 3/25/16 at 5:46 am to dbeck
quote:
That whole chart is flawed. It has Oregon and OU ahead of Alabama in terms of on the field football success.
If any of these efficient teams could "overpay" and have Alabama's success they'd do it in a heartbeat.
Agreed. Alabama is in the red and they have four national championships in one decade. Under the same guy. If winning it all - even one time - doesn't at least put you at breaking even, then what IS success?
Latest Arkansas News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News