Started By
Message

We're about to smoke Clemson

Posted on 1/9/16 at 10:57 pm
Posted by prevatt33
Member since Dec 2011
2837 posts
Posted on 1/9/16 at 10:57 pm
Granted, a fair amount of Crown has seemingly disappeared down my gullet, but I'm 'bout to lay some knowledge on you. The Roll Tide is going to Roll Clemson up and straight smoke 'em, and here's why:

Clemson's LB's are bad. Full Stop.

Seriously, with Lawson likely out (there's very, very little chance he's ready to play 11 days after a knee sprain, i.e. mild MCL tear), their front 7 becomes a more mediocre lot. Alexander at corner is legit, but their other 2 corners are not all world, and while their safeties are tall and athletic, they are known to get out of position - their length and athleticism have simply saved them in the past. But the LB's. Are just. Not. Good.

Bama will run it right at Clemson all night long. And when we're not hammering with Henry, we're gonna play action the LB's to death. We're also gonna see KifJoey Lanewater call a bunch of screens to counter the blitz.

I rewatched the Clemson-Ok game, and noticed that Clemson misses a lot of tackles in space. We're gonna nickel-and-dime the outside, and bust a few.

When Clemson's O is on the field, we will simply stop the zone-read. By doing so, we will have stopped 65% of their offense. Crush the run, and really get after Watson. He throws it up into traffic A LOT when he scrambles, mainly because he's had the better talent on the field in most games. He, and I, have full confidence that Clemson's WR talent can win the jump ball against whichever undersized engineering-major linebacker is playing safety for Wake Forest, but Bama's gonna Yank that noise out of the sky for 6.

Interesting Tidbits:

Bama has the #1 rushing D at 70.8 yards per game.
Clemson has the #19th rushing D at 124.4 yards per rush, which is a 75.7% INCREASE, and against a much weaker schedule of running teams.

Clemson is -5 in turnover margin for the year. No National Champion in the last 20 years has been worse than +3.

Clemson is 8th in the country in yard per rush allowed outside the tackles. They are 47th in the country in yards per rush allowed INSIDE the tackles.

Clemson is 83rd in the country in 20+ yard rushes given up. Of the 22 20-yard rushes the Tigers have allowed this season, 15 have come inside the tackles; only Purdue, Indiana and Texas Tech have allowed more.

Clemson's special teams coverage units are in the bottom 20 in CFB.

Watson completed only 52% of his passes against Oklahoma.

Watson has 12 interceptions on the year, and has 3 multi-interception games.

Four of Clemson's starting Olineman are new starters this year, and their Left Tackle is a true freshman (who's gonna be a good one, but has been abused at times this year).

Name one of their starting WR's, would you please? Thought so.

Here's how it's going to go. Bama's gonna run Henry and Drake all eve'nin, and play action the LB's into oblivion. The screen game's gonna be working, and we're gonna move it regularly. Our Oline will dominate the LOS all. day. long. Clemson's soft. Like a hemorrhoid pillow.

The D is gonna completely shut down the zone-read, and therefore, the run game, forcing Watson to throw under duress. Bama gets 3 interceptions on the day, one for 6. Maybe a QB fumble. They implode from not being able to run the football (and turnovers). Clemson's Oline is over-rated and soft, like a handy-j from a fat girl.

Bama gets 2 non-offensive touchdowns, and beats Clemson 45-16. Clemson hemorrhages the football while not winning either LOS. And all becomes right in the world again. Roll Tide.

And I leave you with the least intelligent 2 minutes in the history of recorded human endeavor.
This post was edited on 1/9/16 at 11:12 pm
Posted by Goombaw
Kentucky
Member since Jan 2013
5251 posts
Posted on 1/9/16 at 11:16 pm to
I don't like it when Clemson fans say this kind of stuff about our team, don't like it when our fans say it about their team.
Posted by prevatt33
Member since Dec 2011
2837 posts
Posted on 1/9/16 at 11:21 pm to
Dude, seriously? I'm not saying Clemson isn't a good team. I'm saying Bama is going to beat a good team badly due to winning the LOS, stopping the run, and forcing turnovers against a team that regularly loses the turnover battle. It's analysis. My analysis is a big win. Get over it.

I truly think Clemson is over-estimated due to the difficulty of lesser teams have in stopping the zone read. Bama will not have the same problem. I literally think Clemson is simply Miss St with a better Oline.

Saban said just the other day that we've played 7 or 8 teams this year who run the hurry up. The speed of the game is a non-narrative. And to top it off, the best defensive mind in CFB has specifically devised a defense, going so far as to change player diets and body types on the Dline, to defend this very offense. Bama's D is a totally different animal and ahead of it's time with the substitution ability.

Clemson's skill position talent rivals Bama's. Their Line talent does not. Watch and see.
This post was edited on 1/9/16 at 11:28 pm
Posted by prevatt33
Member since Dec 2011
2837 posts
Posted on 1/9/16 at 11:45 pm to
Goom, we beat Mich St like a red-headed step mule, correct?

And so please correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't you directly stating that any Bama fan pre-game prediction that was accurate before that game also had to be both ridiculous, insulting, and evidence of being a bad fan - at the moment it was written? Get outta here, bro.

Posted by Goombaw
Kentucky
Member since Jan 2013
5251 posts
Posted on 1/10/16 at 12:06 am to
I wouldn't have liked posts like that either. Even if they were correct, the teams still have to play. Sometimes it seems like all the breaks go against you and you end up losing a game you should have won(Ole Miss).

Obviously you can post what you want, it's just kind of cringey to read posts or hear people completely dismiss the other team.
Posted by 3down10
Member since Sep 2014
22665 posts
Posted on 1/10/16 at 12:20 am to
Those stats aren't going to mean shite when the teams hit the field.

Posted by Kcoyote
Member since Jan 2012
12050 posts
Posted on 1/10/16 at 12:21 am to
I still like reading them. I agree with some of your points OP, but I think it is going to be a much closer game.
Posted by Gary Busey
Member since Dec 2014
33277 posts
Posted on 1/10/16 at 12:28 am to
DGAF

Clemson fricked
Posted by 3down10
Member since Sep 2014
22665 posts
Posted on 1/10/16 at 12:30 am to
quote:

I still like reading them. I agree with some of your points OP, but I think it is going to be a much closer game.


I do as well, but you can't put a ton into them.

For all our stats over the year, look at what we did against Michigan St by design offensively. Completely different than what we had done over the year, especially later in the year when we rode Henry. Stats would have never in a million years predicted or indicated such a thing.

Individual matchups are critical. I did like the Clemson decrease in success on inside runs, and you'd think that would be prime for running Henry there and maybe it is. But who knows what we do etc.
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
83459 posts
Posted on 1/10/16 at 1:19 am to
Did I just see that Watson's o/u for rushing yards is 47.5? Clemson better hope he blows that out the water. Even if he has a really good game passing, I can't envision a Clemson victory where he doesn't run for 70+ yards.
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
83459 posts
Posted on 1/10/16 at 1:30 am to
quote:

For all our stats over the year, look at what we did against Michigan St by design offensively. Completely different than what we had done over the year, especially later in the year when we rode Henry. Stats would have never in a million years predicted or indicated such a thing.

I mean, kinda. Kiffin loves getting the ball to the edges and making defenses commit to cover the from sideline to sideline. Even when they're riding Henry, he tests the edges a TON. There literally isn't a defense in the country that this strategy is more logical against. We might night have predicted that Kiffin would call the game like he did, but it's really obvious why he did it now. And it's not just because it was working, it's because of how MSU runs their defense and stats.

Anything could happen in this game, but look at Alabama's stats on defense. Do you not think think their say, rush defense stats matter in any given week? Stats are important, and for us, interesting.
Posted by remaster916
Alabama
Member since Oct 2012
12221 posts
Posted on 1/10/16 at 12:12 pm to
Anyone see were Clemson's true freshman staring tackle said he goes against better D-lineman in practice. That kid is going to be in a world of hurt tomorrow. Clemson just doesn't know what is about to hit them.
Posted by PepaSpray
Adamantium Membership
Member since Aug 2012
11080 posts
Posted on 1/10/16 at 5:41 pm to
Lol at Klatt. Do these retards realize they are on radio?

Ugh, they do, and they get paid to be dumb as shite. America deserves to lose if this is what Americans want.

Whoa edit: America's hope to beat Bama.
This post was edited on 1/10/16 at 7:05 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter